These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32276234)

  • 1. Directed avoidance and its effect on visual working memory.
    Williams RS; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104277. PubMed ID: 32276234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task-dependent effects of voluntary space-based and involuntary feature-based attention on visual working memory.
    Qian J; Zhang K; Lei Q; Han Y; Li W
    Psychol Res; 2020 Jul; 84(5):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 30840142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the prioritization of items and feature-dimensions in visual working memory.
    Hajonides JE; van Ede F; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Vis; 2020 Aug; 20(8):25. PubMed ID: 32841318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distinct prioritization of visual working memory representations for search and for recall.
    Dube B; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 30644056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Steady-state Visual Evoked Potentials Reveal Dynamic (Re)allocation of Spatial Attention during Maintenance and Utilization of Visual Working Memory.
    Chota S; Bruat AT; Van der Stigchel S; Strauch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 May; 36(5):800-814. PubMed ID: 38261370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working memory prioritization impacts neural recovery from distraction.
    Mallett R; Lewis-Peacock JA
    Cortex; 2019 Dec; 121():225-238. PubMed ID: 31629945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
    Kerzel D; Witzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple high-reward items can be prioritized in working memory but with greater vulnerability to interference.
    Allen RJ; Ueno T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1731-1743. PubMed ID: 29968084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different prioritization states of working memory representations affect visual searches: Evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Wang M; Liu H; Chen Y; Yang P; Fu S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Nov; 193():112246. PubMed ID: 37739042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oculomotor capture reveals trial-by-trial neural correlates of attentional guidance by contents of visual working memory.
    Beck VM; Vickery TJ
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():159-169. PubMed ID: 30392969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The contributions of visual and central attention to visual working memory.
    Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):1897-1916. PubMed ID: 28600676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No effect of monetary reward in a visual working memory task.
    van den Berg R; Zou Q; Li Y; Ma WJ
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280257. PubMed ID: 36649241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm.
    Li Z; Tong M; Chen S; Qian J
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):747-757. PubMed ID: 33415712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benefits of flexible prioritization in working memory can arise without costs.
    Myers NE; Chekroud SR; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):398-411. PubMed ID: 28816476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The precision of spatial selection into the focus of attention in working memory.
    Souza AS; Thalmann M; Oberauer K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2281-2288. PubMed ID: 29687399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reprioritization of Features of Multidimensional Objects Stored in Visual Working Memory.
    Park YE; Sy JL; Hong SW; Tong F
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1773-1785. PubMed ID: 28957016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.