387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32276935)
1. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial carcinoma involving the cervix.
Nasioudis D; Frey MK; Chapman-Davis E; Caputo TA; Holcomb K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):619-625. PubMed ID: 32276935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for stage I high-grade endometrial cancer.
Nasioudis D; Heyward QD; Haggerty AF; Giuntoli Ii RL; Burger RA; Morgan MA; Ko EM; Latif NA
Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 34():7-12. PubMed ID: 32103792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for stage IA cervical carcinoma: a survival analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Nasioudis D; Byrne M; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Cory L; Giuntoli Ii RL; Kim SH; Latif NA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Aug; 31(8):1099-1103. PubMed ID: 33962993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival rates of patients who undergo minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer with cervical involvement.
Kim SI; Park DC; Lee SJ; Song MJ; Kim CJ; Lee HN; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(10):2204-2208. PubMed ID: 33859528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery.
Chambers LM; Carr C; Freeman L; Jernigan AM; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):243.e1-243.e11. PubMed ID: 31075245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of minimally invasive versus open surgery in the treatment of endometrial carcinosarcoma.
Pedra Nobre S; Mueller JJ; Gardner GJ; Long Roche K; Brown CL; Soslow RA; Alektiar KM; Sonoda Y; Broach VA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1162-1168. PubMed ID: 32690592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical hysterectomy is not associated with a survival benefit for patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma.
Nasioudis D; Sakamuri S; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Giuntoli RL; Burger RA; Morgan MA; Latif NA
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):335-339. PubMed ID: 32089334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of surgical approach on prevalence of positive peritoneal cytology and lymph-vascular invasion in patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a National Cancer Database study.
Nasioudis D; Ko EM; Cory L; Latif N
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Jul; 31(7):1001-1006. PubMed ID: 33853880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers.
Nieto VL; Huang Y; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):463.e1-463.e12. PubMed ID: 30086293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.
Segarra-Vidal B; Dinoi G; Zorrilla-Vaca A; Mariani A; Student V; Garcia NA; Llueca Abella A; Ramirez PT
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Dec; 138(6):828-837. PubMed ID: 34735382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of sentinel lymph node mapping for patients with FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.
Nasioudis D; Byrne M; Ko EM; Giuntoli RL; Haggerty AF; Cory L; Kim SH; Morgan MA; Latif NA
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jun; 161(3):705-709. PubMed ID: 33771397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery.
Padilla-Iserte P; Lago V; Tauste C; Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Oliver R; Coronado P; Martín-Salamanca MB; Pantoja-Garrido M; Marcos-Sanmartin J; Gilabert-Estellés J; Lorenzo C; Cazorla E; Roldán-Rivas F; Rodríguez-Hernández JR; Sánchez L; Muruzábal JC; Hervas D; Domingo S;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):65.e1-65.e11. PubMed ID: 32693096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Effectiveness of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
Wright JD; Burke WM; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Huang Y; Hu JC; Hillyer GC; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 34(10):1087-96. PubMed ID: 26834057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive surgery for patients with advanced stage endometrial cancer.
Kim SI; Park DC; Lee SJ; Yoo JG; Song MJ; Kim CJ; Lee HN; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1153-1158. PubMed ID: 33526975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of disease recurrence between robotic versus laparotomy approach in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
Song J; Le T; Hopkins L; Fung-Kee-Fung M; Lupe K; Gaudet M; E C; Samant R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Feb; 30(2):160-166. PubMed ID: 31871112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes with Laparotomy, and Laparoscopic or Robotic Surgery for Women with Endometrial Cancer.
Manchana T; Puangsricharoen P; Sirisabya N; Worasethsin P; Vasuratna A; Termrungruanglert W; Tresukosol D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(13):5483-8. PubMed ID: 26225698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
