835 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32276941)
1. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.
Kohler C; Hertel H; Herrmann J; Marnitz S; Mallmann P; Favero G; Plaikner A; Martus P; Gajda M; Schneider A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 31155516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes based on tumor diameter.
He J; Hao M; Liu P; Liu Z; Lang J; Bin X; Chen C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 32699022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.
Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?
Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Eom JM; Ko JH; Bae JW; Park SH
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 22683586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.
Hwang WY; Kim JH; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):975-980. PubMed ID: 32467336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer: disease recurrence and survival comparison.
Toptas T; Simsek T
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2014 Jun; 24(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 24742012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
