These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32277268)

  • 1. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ mobility after treatment for uterine descent: differences between surgical procedures.
    van IJsselmuiden MN; Lecomte-Grosbras P; Witz JF; Brieu M; Cosson M; van Eijndhoven HWF
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2119-2127. PubMed ID: 32277268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy as treatment for uterine descent: comparison of long-term outcomes.
    van Oudheusden AMJ; Coolen AWM; Hoskam H; Veen J; Bongers MY
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):211-223. PubMed ID: 35482083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
    van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden A; Veen J; van de Pol G; Vollebregt A; Radder CM; Housmans S; van Kuijk S; Deprest J; Bongers MY; van Eijndhoven H
    BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 32267624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
    Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods for the defining mechanisms of anterior vaginal wall descent (DEMAND) study.
    Moalli PA; Bowen ST; Abramowitch SD; Lockhart ME; Ham M; Hahn M; Weidner AC; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Ridgeway BM; Mazloomdoost D; Shaffer A; Gantz MG;
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):809-818. PubMed ID: 32870340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defining mechanisms of recurrence following apical prolapse repair based on imaging criteria.
    Bowen ST; Moalli PA; Abramowitch SD; Lockhart ME; Weidner AC; Ferrando CA; Nager CW; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Gantz MG;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):506.e1-506.e28. PubMed ID: 34087229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
    Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recurrent surgery in uterine prolapse: A nationwide register study.
    Brunes M; Johannesson U; Drca A; Bergman I; Söderberg M; Warnqvist A; Ek M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 May; 101(5):532-541. PubMed ID: 35257371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.
    Developed by the Joint Writing Group of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Mar; 31(3):429-463. PubMed ID: 32040671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vaginal hysterectomy with apical fixation and anterior vaginal wall repair for prolapse: surgical technique and medium-term results.
    Marschke J; Pax CM; Beilecke K; Schwab F; Tunn R
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1187-1192. PubMed ID: 29574485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic review of the surgical management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Chan CYW; Fernandes RA; Yao HH; O'Connell HE; Tse V; Gani J
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Apr; 34(4):825-841. PubMed ID: 36462058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging following native tissue vaginal reconstructive surgery; a prospective study.
    Shatkin-Margolis A; Duke E; Ghodsi V; Hill A; Crisp CC; Pauls RN
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1519-1525. PubMed ID: 33089350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Glazener C; Constable L; Hemming C; Breeman S; Elders A; Cooper K; Freeman R; Smith AR; Hagen S; McDonald A; McPherson G; Montgomery I; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Goulao B; Norrie J
    Trials; 2016 Sep; 17(1):441. PubMed ID: 27609058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol.
    Coolen AWM; van IJsselmuiden MN; van Oudheusden AMJ; Veen J; van Eijndhoven HWF; Mol BWJ; Roovers JP; Bongers MY
    BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28747206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.