113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32277315)
1. A remark on the efficiency of the double-system/single-box nonequilibrium approach in the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.
Procacci P
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Jun; 34(6):635-639. PubMed ID: 32277315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the NS-DSSB unidirectional estimates in the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.
Procacci P; Macchiagodena M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Oct; 35(10):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 34625885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting ligand binding affinity using on- and off-rates for the SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge.
Dixon T; Lotz SD; Dickson A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1001-1012. PubMed ID: 30141102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge.
Papadourakis M; Bosisio S; Michel J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 30159717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.
Rizzi A; Murkli S; McNeill JN; Yao W; Sullivan M; Gilson MK; Chiu MW; Isaacs L; Gibb BC; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):937-963. PubMed ID: 30415285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SAMPL6 blind predictions of water-octanol partition coefficients using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.
Procacci P; Guarnieri G
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):371-384. PubMed ID: 31624982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SAMPL6 host-guest blind predictions using a non equilibrium alchemical approach.
Procacci P; Guarrasi M; Guarnieri G
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):965-982. PubMed ID: 30128927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Absolute binding free energies for the SAMPL6 cucurbit[8]uril host-guest challenge via the AMOEBA polarizable force field.
Laury ML; Wang Z; Gordon AS; Ponder JW
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 30324303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.
Han K; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Nishikawa N; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 30084077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SAMPL7 blind predictions using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.
Procacci P; Guarnieri G
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 33392950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alchemical determination of drug-receptor binding free energy: Where we stand and where we could move to.
Procacci P
J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Jan; 71():233-241. PubMed ID: 27984798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A replica exchange umbrella sampling (REUS) approach to predict host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL8 challenge.
Ghorbani M; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Aviat F; Meana-Pañeda R; Klauda JB; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 May; 35(5):667-677. PubMed ID: 33939083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binding free energies for the SAMPL8 CB8 "Drugs of Abuse" challenge from umbrella sampling combined with Hamiltonian replica exchange.
Markthaler D; Kraus H; Hansen N
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Jan; 36(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 34978001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. II. Dissociation free energies in drug-receptor systems via nonequilibrium alchemical simulations: application to the FK506-related immunophilin ligands.
Nerattini F; Chelli R; Procacci P
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Jun; 18(22):15005-18. PubMed ID: 27193181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative Binding Free Energy between Chemically Distant Compounds Using a Bidirectional Nonequilibrium Approach.
Procacci P
J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jun; 18(6):4014-4026. PubMed ID: 35642423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Binding free energy predictions in host-guest systems using Autodock4. A retrospective analysis on SAMPL6, SAMPL7 and SAMPL8 challenges.
Casbarra L; Procacci P
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jun; 35(6):721-729. PubMed ID: 34027592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.
Sun Z; He Q; Li X; Zhu Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):589-600. PubMed ID: 31974852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
