These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32277335)

  • 1. Analysis of re-operations after cervical total disc replacement in a consecutive series of 535 patients receiving the ProDisc-C device.
    Zigler JE; Guyer RD; Blumenthal SL; Ohnmeiss DD
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Nov; 29(11):2683-2687. PubMed ID: 32277335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Removals and Revisions of Cervical Total Disc Replacement Devices in a Consecutive Series of 1626 Patients Beginning With the First Case Experience in 2003.
    Blumenthal SL; Griffin C; Courtois EC; Guyer RD; Zigler JE; Shellock JL; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2024 Oct; 49(19):1348-1351. PubMed ID: 38747243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.
    Singh K; Phillips FM; Park DK; Pelton MA; An HS; Goldberg EJ
    Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22425784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
    Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 5-year results with a metal-on-metal artificial disc.
    Coric D; Guyer RD; Nunley PD; Musante D; Carmody C; Gordon C; Lauryssen C; Boltes MO; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 29303467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up.
    Jackson RJ; Davis RJ; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Hisey MS; Kim KD; Gaede SE; Nunley PD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):734-45. PubMed ID: 26799118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.
    Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.
    Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In which cases do surgeons specializing in total disc replacement perform fusion in patients with cervical spine symptoms?
    Guyer RD; Ohnmeiss DD; Blumenthal SL; Zigler JE
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Nov; 29(11):2665-2669. PubMed ID: 31897732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
    Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Different Hybrid Techniques for the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease-Analysis of Prospectively Collected Clinical, Radiologic, and Psychological Parameters.
    Brotzki C; Petridis AK; Steiger HJ; Bostelmann T; Bostelmann R
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Aug; 140():e112-e120. PubMed ID: 32371075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reoperations in cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior cervical fusion: results compiled from multiple prospective food and drug administration investigational device exemption trials conducted at a single site.
    Blumenthal SL; Ohnmeiss DD; Guyer RD; Zigler JE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(14):1177-82. PubMed ID: 23429685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.
    Janssen ME; Zigler JE; Spivak JM; Delamarter RB; Darden BV; Kopjar B
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(21):1738-47. PubMed ID: 26537161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis.
    Park DK; Lin EL; Phillips FM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):721-30. PubMed ID: 20543765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement.
    Mehren C; Heider F; Siepe CJ; Zillner B; Kothe R; Korge A; Mayer HM
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 28676980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Cervical Total Disk Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion: Results at 48 Months Follow-up.
    Hisey MS; Bae HW; Davis RJ; Gaede S; Hoffman G; Kim KD; Nunley PD; Peterson D; Rashbaum RF; Stokes J; Ohnmeiss DD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 May; 28(4):E237-43. PubMed ID: 25310394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of failed cervical total disc replacements in a series of 53 cases and description of a management strategy.
    Blumenthal SL; Ohnmeiss DD; Courtois EC; Guyer RD; Zigler JE; Shellock JL
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Aug; 33(8):3117-3123. PubMed ID: 39026079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and radiologic comparison of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty and cervical total disc replacement for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.
    Shichang L; Yueming S; Limin L; Lei W; Zhongjie Z; Chunguang Z; Xi Y
    J Clin Neurosci; 2016 May; 27():102-9. PubMed ID: 26928156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
    Loumeau TP; Darden BV; Kesman TJ; Odum SM; Van Doren BA; Laxer EB; Murrey DB
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2263-70. PubMed ID: 26869078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.