These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32278032)

  • 1. The predictivity of the -alert performance- functionality of the OECD QSAR-Toolbox (c/w further issues on the predictivity of nonclinical testing).
    Suarez-Torres JD; Ciangherotti CE; Jimenez-Orozco FA
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2020 Aug; 66():104858. PubMed ID: 32278032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The implementation of RAAF in the OECD QSAR Toolbox.
    Kuseva C; Schultz TW; Yordanova D; Tankova K; Kutsarova S; Pavlov T; Chapkanov A; Georgiev M; Gissi A; Sobanski T; Mekenyan OG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Jul; 105():51-61. PubMed ID: 30970268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the OECD QSAR toolbox automatic workflow for the prediction of the acute toxicity of organic chemicals to fathead minnow.
    Mombelli E; Pandard P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jun; 122():104893. PubMed ID: 33587933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of performance of the profilers provided in the OECD QSAR toolbox for category formation of chemicals.
    Aljallal MA; Chaudhry Q; Price NR
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):18330. PubMed ID: 39112641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Insights into toxicology, safety pharmacology, and drug dependence testing: The performance and predictive values of nonclinical tests.
    Suarez-Torres JD; Ciangherotti CE; Jimenez-Orozco FA
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2020; 103():106684. PubMed ID: 32173560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Promises and pitfalls of quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches for predicting metabolism and toxicity.
    Zvinavashe E; Murk AJ; Rietjens IM
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Dec; 21(12):2229-36. PubMed ID: 19548346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Ahuja V; Adiga Perdur G; Aj Z; Krishnappa M; Kandarova H
    Altern Lab Anim; 2024 Jul; 52(4):195-204. PubMed ID: 38910363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The OECD QSAR Toolbox Starts Its Second Decade.
    Schultz TW; Diderich R; Kuseva CD; Mekenyan OG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():55-77. PubMed ID: 29934887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building on a solid foundation: SAR and QSAR as a fundamental strategy to reduce animal testing.
    Sullivan KM; Manuppello JR; Willett CE
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2014; 25(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 24773450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A three-tier QSAR modeling strategy for estimating eye irritation potential of diverse chemicals in rabbit for regulatory purposes.
    Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():282-91. PubMed ID: 27018829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of IATA - A case study in evaluating the global and local performance of a Bayesian network model for skin sensitization.
    Fitzpatrick JM; Patlewicz G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 28(4):297-310. PubMed ID: 28423913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The OECD Principles for (Q)SAR Models in the Context of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD).
    Gómez-Jiménez G; Gonzalez-Ponce K; Castillo-Pazos DJ; Madariaga-Mazon A; Barroso-Flores J; Cortes-Guzman F; Martinez-Mayorga K
    Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol; 2018; 113():85-117. PubMed ID: 30149907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From QSAR to QSIIR: searching for enhanced computational toxicology models.
    Zhu H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 930():53-65. PubMed ID: 23086837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of Computational Methods.
    Patlewicz G; Worth AP; Ball N
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 856():165-187. PubMed ID: 27671722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing computational toxicology models with phytochemicals.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Busta E; Minnier BL; Kruhlak NL; Benz RD
    Mol Nutr Food Res; 2010 Feb; 54(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 20024931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the OECD (Q)SAR Application Toolbox and Toxtree for predicting and profiling the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
    Mombelli E; Devillers J
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):731-52. PubMed ID: 21120759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of a quantitative structure-activity relationship for chronic narcosis to fish.
    Claeys L; Iaccino F; Janssen CR; Van Sprang P; Verdonck F
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Oct; 32(10):2217-25. PubMed ID: 23775559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. QSAR Use in REACH Analyses of Alternatives to Predict Human Health and Environmental Toxicity of Alternative Chemical Substances.
    Chinen K; Malloy T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Sep; 16(5):745-760. PubMed ID: 32162772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental verification of structural alerts for the protein binding of cyclic compounds acting as Michael acceptors.
    Rodriguez-Sanchez N; Schultz TW; Cronin MT; Enoch SJ
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):963-77. PubMed ID: 23988158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.