346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32278091)
1. Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization.
Jaiswal A; Nenonen J; Stenroos M; Gramfort A; Dalal SS; Westner BU; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Schoffelen JM; Witton C; Oostenveld R; Parkkonen L
Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116797. PubMed ID: 32278091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A unified view on beamformers for M/EEG source reconstruction.
Westner BU; Dalal SS; Gramfort A; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Oostenveld R; Schoffelen JM
Neuroimage; 2022 Feb; 246():118789. PubMed ID: 34890794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Localization of coherent sources by simultaneous MEG and EEG beamformer.
Hong JH; Ahn M; Kim K; Jun SC
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Oct; 51(10):1121-35. PubMed ID: 23793511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources.
Kuznetsova A; Nurislamova Y; Ossadtchi A
Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117677. PubMed ID: 33385549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance analysis of reduced-rank beamformers for estimating dipole source signals using EEG/MEG.
Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A; Dogandzić A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):840-4. PubMed ID: 16686406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.
Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Clerc M; Engwer C; Wolters CH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):978-992. PubMed ID: 33156569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Localization accuracy of a common beamformer for the comparison of two conditions.
Lucena Gómez G; Peigneux P; Wens V; Bourguignon M
Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 230():117793. PubMed ID: 33497769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative Evaluation in Estimating Sources Underlying Brain Oscillations Using Current Source Density Methods and Beamformer Approaches.
Halder T; Talwar S; Jaiswal AK; Banerjee A
eNeuro; 2019; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 31311804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Signal space separation beamformer.
Vrba J; Taulu S; Nenonen J; Ahonen A
Brain Topogr; 2010 Jun; 23(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 19943101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Towards an objective evaluation of EEG/MEG source estimation methods - The linear approach.
Hauk O; Stenroos M; Treder MS
Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 255():119177. PubMed ID: 35390459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EEG and MEG: sensitivity to epileptic spike activity as function of source orientation and depth.
Hunold A; Funke ME; Eichardt R; Stenroos M; Haueisen J
Physiol Meas; 2016 Jul; 37(7):1146-62. PubMed ID: 27328313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates.
Lin FH; Witzel T; Ahlfors SP; Stufflebeam SM; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 16520063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatio-temporal Reconstruction of Neural Sources Using Indirect Dominant Mode Rejection.
Jafadideh AT; Asl BM
Brain Topogr; 2018 Jul; 31(4):591-607. PubMed ID: 29704076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
Engemann DA; Gramfort A
Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of beamformer and ICA for dynamic connectivity analysis: A simultaneous MEG-SEEG study.
Coelli S; Medina Villalon S; Bonini F; Velmurugan J; López-Madrona VJ; Carron R; Bartolomei F; Badier JM; Bénar CG
Neuroimage; 2023 Jan; 265():119806. PubMed ID: 36513288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
