These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32278498)

  • 1. Is one dental mini-implant biomechanically appropriate for the retention of a mandibular overdenture? A comparison with Morse taper and external hexagon platforms.
    Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Caldas RA; Pisani MX; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):491-499. PubMed ID: 32278498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants.
    Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single implant retained overdentures: Evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis.
    Eraslan R; Yagci F; Esim E
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):348-357. PubMed ID: 37950537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stress distribution of single-implant-retained overdenture reinforced with a framework: A finite element analysis study.
    Amaral CF; Gomes RS; Rodrigues Garcia RCM; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):791-796. PubMed ID: 28965674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Pereira CA; Alves JL; Henriques B; Souza JCM; López-López J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():441-447. PubMed ID: 28499606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: A 3D finite element analysis study.
    Elsayyad AA; Abbas NA; AbdelNabi NM; Osman RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):68.e1-68.e10. PubMed ID: 32199642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of specific retention biomaterials for ball attachment on the biomechanical response of single implant-supported overdenture: A finite element analysis.
    Gibreel M; Sameh A; Hegazy S; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK; Perea-Lowery L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Oct; 122():104653. PubMed ID: 34229172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 3-D Finite Element Analysis of a Single Implant Retained Overdenture Reinforced with Short Versus Long Frameworks.
    El-Okl AB; Abou Neel EA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 May; 29(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 33393743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress distribution of one-piece and two-piece mini-Implant overdentures with various attachment systems and diameters: A finite element analysis.
    Trang BNH; Kanazawa M; Murakami N; Wakabayashi N; Hada T; Sahaprom N; Komagamine Y; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jul; 67(3):430-436. PubMed ID: 36372437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis.
    Hong HR; Pae A; Kim Y; Paek J; Kim HS; Kwon KR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):e69-76. PubMed ID: 23057045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Implant Positions and Occlusal Forces on Peri-Implant Bone Stress in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Brizuela-Velasco A; Martin-Fernandez E; Ellacuria-Echebarria J
    J Oral Implantol; 2017 Dec; 43(6):419-428. PubMed ID: 28972823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.