226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32278504)
1. New Cognitive Neurotechnology Facilitates Studies of Cortical-Subcortical Interactions.
Min BK; Hämäläinen MS; Pantazis D
Trends Biotechnol; 2020 Sep; 38(9):952-962. PubMed ID: 32278504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detectability of cerebellar activity with magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
Samuelsson JG; Sundaram P; Khan S; Sereno MI; Hämäläinen MS
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jun; 41(9):2357-2372. PubMed ID: 32115870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sparsity enables estimation of both subcortical and cortical activity from MEG and EEG.
Krishnaswamy P; Obregon-Henao G; Ahveninen J; Khan S; Babadi B; Iglesias JE; Hämäläinen MS; Purdon PL
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):E10465-E10474. PubMed ID: 29138310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recording human electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals for neuroscientific research and real-time functional cortical mapping.
Hill NJ; Gupta D; Brunner P; Gunduz A; Adamo MA; Ritaccio A; Schalk G
J Vis Exp; 2012 Jun; (64):. PubMed ID: 22782131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.
Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS
Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comprehensive study on electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography sensitivity to cortical and subcortical sources.
Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Clerc M; Engwer C; Wolters CH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Mar; 42(4):978-992. PubMed ID: 33156569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EEG and MEG: relevance to neuroscience.
Lopes da Silva F
Neuron; 2013 Dec; 80(5):1112-28. PubMed ID: 24314724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MEG and TMS combined with EEG for mapping alcohol effects.
Kähkönen S
Alcohol; 2005 Nov; 37(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 16713500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fundamentals of electroencefalography, magnetoencefalography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Babiloni C; Pizzella V; Gratta CD; Ferretti A; Romani GL
Int Rev Neurobiol; 2009; 86():67-80. PubMed ID: 19607991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetoencephalography can reveal deep brain network activities linked to memory processes.
López-Madrona VJ; Medina Villalon S; Badier JM; Trébuchon A; Jayabal V; Bartolomei F; Carron R; Barborica A; Vulliémoz S; Alario FX; Bénar CG
Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Oct; 43(15):4733-4749. PubMed ID: 35766240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head models and dynamic causal modeling of subcortical activity using magnetoencephalographic/electroencephalographic data.
Attal Y; Maess B; Friederici A; David O
Rev Neurosci; 2012; 23(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 22718615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.
Das P; Brodbeck C; Simon JZ; Babadi B
Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116528. PubMed ID: 31945510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can EEG and MEG detect signals from the human cerebellum?
Andersen LM; Jerbi K; Dalal SS
Neuroimage; 2020 Jul; 215():116817. PubMed ID: 32278092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional magnetic resonance imaging blood oxygenation level-dependent signal and magnetoencephalography evoked responses yield different neural functionality in reading.
Vartiainen J; Liljeström M; Koskinen M; Renvall H; Salmelin R
J Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 31(3):1048-58. PubMed ID: 21248130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous recording of MEG, EEG and intracerebral EEG during visual stimulation: from feasibility to single-trial analysis.
Dubarry AS; Badier JM; Trébuchon-Da Fonseca A; Gavaret M; Carron R; Bartolomei F; Liégeois-Chauvel C; Régis J; Chauvel P; Alario FX; Bénar CG
Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():548-58. PubMed ID: 24862073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EEG, MEG and neuromodulatory approaches to explore cognition: Current status and future directions.
Beppi C; Ribeiro Violante I; Scott G; Sandrone S
Brain Cogn; 2021 Mar; 148():105677. PubMed ID: 33486194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study.
Bénar CG; Grova C; Jirsa VK; Lina JM
J Comput Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 47(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31292816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping of the neuronal networks of human cortical brain functions.
Momjian S; Seghier M; Seeck M; Michel CM
Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg; 2003; 28():91-142. PubMed ID: 12627809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
Engemann DA; Gramfort A
Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
