These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32278613)

  • 1. The Effects of Contextual Priming and Alaryngeal Speech Mode on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Listener Comfort.
    Failla S; Al-Zanoon N; Smith N; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2021 Nov; 35(6):934.e17-934.e23. PubMed ID: 32278613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of clear speech on auditory-perceptual judgments of electrolaryngeal speech.
    Cox SR; Doyle PC
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 75():25-36. PubMed ID: 30005317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech.
    Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A
    J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Listener impressions of alaryngeal communication modalities.
    Knollhoff SM; Borrie SA; Barrett TS; Searl JP
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):540-547. PubMed ID: 33501872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Clear Speech on Cantonese Alaryngeal Speakers' Intelligibility.
    Hui TF; Cox SR; Huang T; Chen WR; Ng ML
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 34333487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of the Lombard Effect in Improving Alaryngeal Speech.
    Ng ML
    J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31350113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Chu R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of audio-visual information and mode of speech on listener perceptions of alaryngeal speakers.
    Evitts PM; Van Dine A; Holler A
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2009; 11(6):450-60. PubMed ID: 21271922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptability ratings and intelligibility scores of alaryngeal speakers by three listener groups.
    Bridges A
    Br J Disord Commun; 1991 Dec; 26(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 1814417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Phonatory Break Duration and Pause Time on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Speech Acceptability and Listener Comfort in Adductor-Type Laryngeal Dystonia.
    Doyle PC; Woldmo R; Nagle KF; Crews N; Jovanovic N
    J Voice; 2024 Jul; 38(4):965.e15-965.e24. PubMed ID: 34887140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of listener sophistication on judgements of tracheoesophageal talker intelligibility.
    Doyle PC; Swift ER; Haaf RG
    J Commun Disord; 1989 Apr; 22(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 2723141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alaryngeal speech intelligibility and the older listener.
    Clark JG
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 Feb; 50(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 3974214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Lombard effect associated with Chinese male alaryngeal speech.
    Ng ML; Tsang GCK
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Dec; 21(6):584-592. PubMed ID: 30732483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Apr; 114(4):753-9. PubMed ID: 15064636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech intelligibility, acceptability, and communication-related quality of life in Chinese alaryngeal speakers.
    Law IK; Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 135(7):704-11. PubMed ID: 19620593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceived listener effort as an outcome measure for disordered speech.
    Nagle KF; Eadie TL
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 73():34-49. PubMed ID: 29567465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ratings of intelligibility of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech.
    Cullinan WL; Brown CS; Blalock PD
    J Commun Disord; 1986 Jun; 19(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 3722432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective eye-gaze behaviour during face-to-face communication with proficient alaryngeal speakers: a preliminary study.
    Evitts P; Gallop R
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(5):535-49. PubMed ID: 21899671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reaction times of normal listeners to laryngeal, alaryngeal, and synthetic speech.
    Evitts PM; Searl J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1380-90. PubMed ID: 17197503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
    Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.