These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32279922)

  • 1. Optimising image quality and radiation dose for neonatal incubator imaging.
    Tugwell-Allsup J; Morris RW; Hibbs R; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):e258-e263. PubMed ID: 32279922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mobile chest imaging of neonates in incubators: Optimising DR and CR acquisitions.
    Tugwell-Allsup J; Kenworthy D; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 32636056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of radiation dose to organs of neonatal patients during portable X-ray examination in incubators: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Kim E; Park H; Kim K; Yoon Y; Lim C; Kim J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(2):333-342. PubMed ID: 35068414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neonatal digital chest radiography- should we be using additional copper filtration?
    Tugwell-Allsup JR; Morris RW; Thomas K; Hibbs R; England A
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211026. PubMed ID: 34797726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging neonates within an incubator - A survey to determine existing working practice.
    Tugwell-Allsup J; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Feb; 26(1):e18-e23. PubMed ID: 31902464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A systematic review of incubator-based neonatal radiography - What does the evidence say?
    Tugwell-Allsup J; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 32052784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antero-posterior (AP) pelvis x-ray imaging on a trolley: Impact of trolley design, mattress design and radiographer practice on image quality and radiation dose.
    Tugwell JR; England A; Hogg P
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):242-248. PubMed ID: 28687293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of comfort pads and incubator design on neonatal radiography.
    Jiang X; Baad M; Reiser I; Feinstein KA; Lu Z
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Jan; 46(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 26335424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose evaluation to organs in neonatal patients by field size during potable X-ray examination in incubators: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Jo A; Kim E
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2023; 31(5):1115-1124. PubMed ID: 37545249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality.
    Wenman A; Lockwood P
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Mar; 30(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 38295494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging the neonate in the incubator: an investigation of the technical, radiological and nursing issues.
    Mutch SJ; Wentworth SD
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 80(959):902-10. PubMed ID: 17875591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimisation of the AP abdomen projection for larger patient body thicknesses.
    Gatt S; Portelli JL; Zarb F
    Radiography (Lond); 2022 Feb; 28(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 34544645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of added filtration on radiation dose and image quality in digital radiography of newborns.
    Papadakis AE; Giannakaki V; Hatzidaki E; Damilakis J
    Pediatr Radiol; 2023 Sep; 53(10):2060-2068. PubMed ID: 37310445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of acquisition parameters on dose and image quality optimisation in paediatric pelvis radiography-A phantom study.
    Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; Abuzaid M; England A
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():130-137. PubMed ID: 31439232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modification of chest radiography exposure parameters using a neonatal chest phantom.
    Schäfer SB; Papst S; Fiebich M; Rudolph C; de Laffolie J; Krombach GA
    Pediatr Radiol; 2020 Jan; 50(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 31583441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neonatal chest radiography: Influence of standard clinical protocols and radiographic equipment on pathology visibility and radiation dose using a neonatal chest phantom.
    Al-Murshedi S; Peter Hogg ; England A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):282-287. PubMed ID: 32169312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image quality associated with the use of an MR-compatible incubator in neonatal neuroimaging.
    O'Regan K; Filan P; Pandit N; Maher M; Fanning N
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 85(1012):363-7. PubMed ID: 22457402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the anode heel effect be used to optimise radiation dose and image quality for AP pelvis radiography?
    Mraity HAAB; Walton L; England A; Thompson J; Lanca L; Hogg P
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e103-e108. PubMed ID: 32052763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital pelvic radiography: increasing distance to reduce dose.
    Heath R; England A; Ward A; Charnock P; Ward M; Evans P; Harding L
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 83(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 21908777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.