131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32280519)
1. A Modified Surgical Technique of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling: Continuous Arc-Shaped Foldback Peeling.
Xie ZG; He QY; Zhu J; Du W; Tong J; Chen F
J Ophthalmol; 2020; 2020():3568938. PubMed ID: 32280519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel surgical technique of internal limiting membrane peeling for high myopic foveoschisis: a wide range of whole piece consecutive peeling without preservation of epi-fovea.
He S; Su T; Zhou ZY; Li XM; Xu W; Qiu QH
Int J Ophthalmol; 2022; 15(2):284-290. PubMed ID: 35186689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomical and visual outcomes of fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling with or without inverted flap technique for myopic foveoschisis.
Zheng D; Huang Z; Zeng Q; Wang Y; Chen S; Yi J; Fang D; Huang D; Chen W
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):444. PubMed ID: 36401229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fovea sparing internal limiting membrane peeling using multiple parafoveal curvilinear peels for myopic foveoschisis: technique and outcome.
Jin H; Zhang Q; Zhao P
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):180. PubMed ID: 27756275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of non-fovea-sparing ILM peeling for symptomatic myopic foveoschisis with and without macular hole.
Al-Badawi AH; Abdelhakim MASE; Macky TA; Mortada HA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 103(2):257-263. PubMed ID: 29712637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fovea-Sparing as Opposed to Total Peeling of Internal Limiting Membrane for Myopic Foveoschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Azuma K; Hirasawa K; Araki F; Shiraya T; Yashiro S; Kato S; Nagahara M; Ueta T
Ophthalmol Retina; 2021 Jul; 5(7):670-679. PubMed ID: 33307217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy.
Shimada N; Sugamoto Y; Ogawa M; Takase H; Ohno-Matsui K
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Oct; 154(4):693-701. PubMed ID: 22835515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical outcomes of centripetal non-fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis with and without foveal detachment: a follow-up of at least 3 years.
Peng KL; Kung YH; Hsu CM; Chang SP; Tseng PL; Wu TT
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Sep; 104(9):1266-1270. PubMed ID: 31831505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fovea-Sparing versus Standard Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Myopic Traction Maculopathy: A Study of 102 Consecutive Cases.
Shiraki N; Wakabayashi T; Ikuno Y; Matsumura N; Sato S; Sakaguchi H; Nishida K
Ophthalmol Retina; 2020 Dec; 4(12):1170-1180. PubMed ID: 32470651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of Vitrectomy with Fovea-Sparing and Inverted ILM Flap Technique for Myopic Foveoschisis.
Wakatsuki Y; Nakashizuka H; Tanaka K; Mori R; Shimada H
J Clin Med; 2022 Feb; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 35268365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FOVEA-SPARING VERSUS COMPLETE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING IN VITRECTOMY FOR VITREOMACULAR INTERFACE DISEASES: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Wang Y; Zhao X; Zhang W; Yang J; Chen Y
Retina; 2021 Jun; 41(6):1143-1152. PubMed ID: 34001832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term surgical outcomes of multiple parfoveolar curvilinear internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.
Tian T; Jin H; Zhang Q; Zhang X; Zhang H; Zhao P
Eye (Lond); 2018 Nov; 32(11):1783-1789. PubMed ID: 30061650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vitrectomy with Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Myopic Foveoschisis.
Seppey C; Wolfensberger TJ
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2017 Apr; 234(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 28470646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling with perfluoropropane tamponade or balanced saline solution for myopic foveoschisis.
Zheng B; Chen Y; Chen Y; Zhao Z; Zhang Z; Zheng J; You Y; Wang Q; Shen L
Retina; 2011 Apr; 31(4):692-701. PubMed ID: 21836401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING VERSUS INVERTED FLAP TECHNIQUE FOR TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN A LARGE SERIES OF PATIENTS.
Rizzo S; Tartaro R; Barca F; Caporossi T; Bacherini D; Giansanti F
Retina; 2018 Sep; 38 Suppl 1():S73-S78. PubMed ID: 29232338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.
Yuan J; Zhang LL; Lu YJ; Han MY; Yu AH; Cai XJ
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):219. PubMed ID: 29179705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular hole surgery: a comparative study.
Ramtohul P; Parrat E; Denis D; Lorenzi U
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):11. PubMed ID: 31907015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vitrectomy with Inverted Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane for Myopic Foveoschisis.
Li X; Wang J; Wu Y; Wang X; Zhang Z; Hu Z; Xie P
J Ophthalmol; 2022; 2022():3242747. PubMed ID: 35190775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.
Gui J; Ai L; Huang T
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 32131776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Central scotoma after indocyanine green assisted fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling.
Mito T; Kobayashi T; Shiraishi A
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep; 2020 Dec; 20():100942. PubMed ID: 33024891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
