130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32281031)
1. Patient-generated health data collection using a wearable activity tracker in cancer patients-a feasibility study.
Miyaji T; Kawaguchi T; Azuma K; Suzuki S; Sano Y; Akatsu M; Torii A; Kamimura T; Ozawa Y; Tsuchida A; Eriguchi D; Hashiguchi M; Nishino M; Nishi M; Inadome Y; Yamazaki T; Kiuchi T; Yamaguchi T
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Dec; 28(12):5953-5961. PubMed ID: 32281031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A wearable activity tracker intervention for promoting physical activity in adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot study.
Heale LD; Dover S; Goh YI; Maksymiuk VA; Wells GD; Feldman BM
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J; 2018 Oct; 16(1):66. PubMed ID: 30348203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Succeeding with prolonged usage of consumer-based activity trackers in clinical studies: a mixed methods approach.
Henriksen A; Sand AS; Deraas T; Grimsgaard S; Hartvigsen G; Hopstock L
BMC Public Health; 2020 Aug; 20(1):1300. PubMed ID: 32854671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cancer Patients' Perception of Usefulness of Wearable Exercise Trackers.
Ng A; Gupta E; Bansal S; Fontillas RC; Amos CE; Williams JL; Dibaj S; Bruera E
PM R; 2021 Aug; 13(8):845-851. PubMed ID: 32844592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parental Perspectives of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Children Younger Than 13 Years: Acceptability and Usability Study.
Mackintosh KA; Chappel SE; Salmon J; Timperio A; Ball K; Brown H; Macfarlane S; Ridgers ND
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Nov; 7(11):e13858. PubMed ID: 31682585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring Daily Compliance With Physical Activity Tracking in Ambulatory Surgery Patients: Comparative Analysis of Five Compliance Criteria.
Kelly R; Jones S; Price B; Katz D; McCormick C; Pearce O
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e22846. PubMed ID: 33496677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating Motivational Interviewing and Habit Formation to Enhance the Effect of Activity Trackers on Healthy Adults' Activity Levels: Randomized Intervention.
Ellingson LD; Lansing JE; DeShaw KJ; Peyer KL; Bai Y; Perez M; Phillips LA; Welk GJ
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Feb; 7(2):e10988. PubMed ID: 30762582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wristband Accelerometers to motiVate arm Exercise after Stroke (WAVES): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Moore SA; Da Silva R; Balaam M; Brkic L; Jackson D; Jamieson D; Ploetz T; Rodgers H; Shaw L; van Wijck F; Price C
Trials; 2016 Oct; 17(1):508. PubMed ID: 27769310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of wearable fitness devices.
Kaewkannate K; Kim S
BMC Public Health; 2016 May; 16():433. PubMed ID: 27220855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fitbit Usage in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.
Dreher N; Hadeler EK; Hartman SJ; Wong EC; Acerbi I; Rugo HS; Majure MC; Chien AJ; Esserman LJ; Melisko ME
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(6):443-449.e1. PubMed ID: 31285177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation of wearable health tracker version updates.
Woolley SI; Collins T; Mitchell J; Fredericks D
BMJ Health Care Inform; 2019 Oct; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 31597642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Data management and wearables in older adults: A systematic review.
Alharbi M; Straiton N; Smith S; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
Maturitas; 2019 Jun; 124():100-110. PubMed ID: 30910279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of Wearable Activity Tracker in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy: Toward Evaluating Risk of Unplanned Health Care Encounters.
Nilanon T; Nocera LP; Martin AS; Kolatkar A; May M; Hasnain Z; Ueno NT; Yennu S; Alexander A; Mejia AE; Boles RW; Li M; Lee JSH; Hanlon SE; Cozzens Philips FA; Quinn DI; Newton PK; Broderick J; Shahabi C; Kuhn P; Nieva JJ
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2020 Sep; 4():839-853. PubMed ID: 32970482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heart Rate Measures From Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in a Laboratory and Free-Living Setting: Validation Study.
Müller AM; Wang NX; Yao J; Tan CS; Low ICC; Lim N; Tan J; Tan A; Müller-Riemenschneider F
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct; 7(10):e14120. PubMed ID: 31579026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.
Paré G; Leaver C; Bourget C
J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e177. PubMed ID: 29720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring the impact of ambulatory red blood cell transfusion on home functional status: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Murphree DH; Kinard TN; Khera N; Storlie CB; Ngufor C; Upadhyaya S; Pathak J; Fortune E; Jacob EK; Carter RE; Poterack KA; Kor DJ
Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):153. PubMed ID: 28359342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of Wearable Physical Activity Monitors in Patients With Cancer.
Gupta A; Stewart T; Bhulani N; Dong Y; Rahimi Z; Crane K; Rethorst C; Beg MS
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2018 Dec; 2():1-10. PubMed ID: 30652571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical Activity Trend eXtraction: A Framework for Extracting Moderate-Vigorous Physical Activity Trends From Wearable Fitness Tracker Data.
Faust L; Wang C; Hachen D; Lizardo O; Chawla NV
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e11075. PubMed ID: 30860488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
Mercer K; Giangregorio L; Schneider E; Chilana P; Li M; Grindrod K
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jan; 4(1):e7. PubMed ID: 26818775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Adolescents' Perspectives on Combining Technologies for Physical Activity Promotion Within an Intervention: Usability Study.
Drehlich M; Naraine M; Rowe K; Lai SK; Salmon J; Brown H; Koorts H; Macfarlane S; Ridgers ND
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Mar; 22(3):e15552. PubMed ID: 32141834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]