176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32283045)
21. Preservation of fertility in female: Indications, available options, and current status in Saudi Arabia.
Aljaser F
Semin Oncol; 2020 Dec; 47(6):390-397. PubMed ID: 33131895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Random start ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation appears unlikely to delay initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Letourneau JM; Sinha N; Wald K; Harris E; Quinn M; Imbar T; Mok-Lin E; Chien AJ; Rosen M
Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2123-2129. PubMed ID: 28938748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Strategies to Maintain Fertility in Young Breast Cancer Patients.
Constance ES; Moravek MB; Jeruss JS
Cancer Treat Res; 2018; 173():1-13. PubMed ID: 29349754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.
Alvarez RM; Ramanathan P
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2051-2059. PubMed ID: 27370358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fertility preservation in oncology patients: A literature review examining current fertility preservation techniques and access to oncofertility services in Australia.
Robson D; Phua C; Howard R; Marren A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 60(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 31617210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation-ESHRE-ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives.
Martinez F
Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 32(9):1802-1811. PubMed ID: 29117320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Installing oncofertility programs for breast cancer in limited versus optimum resource settings: Empirical data from 39 surveyed centers in Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II.
Salama M; Lambertini M; Christianson MS; Jayasinghe Y; Anazodo A; De Vos M; Amant F; Stern C; Appiah L; Woodard TL; Anderson RA; Westphal LM; Leach RE; Rodriguez-Wallberg KA; Patrizio P; Woodruff TK
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Feb; 39(2):505-516. PubMed ID: 35032286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Current Status and Issues of the Japan Oncofertility Registry.
Shigematsu K; Shimizu C; Furui T; Kataoka S; Kawai K; Kishida T; Kuwahara A; Maeda N; Makino A; Mizunuma N; Morishige KI; Nakajima TE; Ota K; Ono M; Shiga N; Tada Y; Takae S; Tamura N; Watanabe C; Yumura Y; Suzuki N; Takai Y
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol; 2023 Aug; 12(4):584-591. PubMed ID: 36516123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Strategies for fertility preservation in young early breast cancer patients.
Tomasi-Cont N; Lambertini M; Hulsbosch S; Peccatori AF; Amant F
Breast; 2014 Oct; 23(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 24934638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Oncofertility in Japan: advances in research and the roles of oncofertility consortia.
Suzuki N
Future Oncol; 2016 Oct; 12(20):2307-11. PubMed ID: 27531055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study.
Delattre S; Segers I; Van Moer E; Drakopoulos P; Mateizel I; Enghels L; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2524-2536. PubMed ID: 32951035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Expanding Urgent Oncofertility Services for Reproductive Age Women Remote from a Tertiary Level Fertility Centre by Use of Telemedicine and an On-site Nurse Navigator.
Zwingerman R; Melenchuk K; McMahon E; Liu KE; Siren A; Laferriere N; Greenblatt EM
J Cancer Educ; 2020 Jun; 35(3):515-521. PubMed ID: 30820926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The safety and efficacy of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation in women with early breast cancer: a systematic review.
Rodgers RJ; Reid GD; Koch J; Deans R; Ledger WL; Friedlander M; Gilchrist RB; Walters KA; Abbott JA
Hum Reprod; 2017 May; 32(5):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 28333356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Regional air transportation of ovarian tissue for cryopreservation in a prepubertal female with cancer.
Schermerhorn SMV; Rosen MP; Blevins EM; Byrd KA; Rabban JT; Marsh P; Lucas DJ
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2021 Sep; 68(9):e29107. PubMed ID: 34105898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: the state of art in 2014?].
Comtet M; Sonigo C; Valdelièvre C; Sermondade N; Sifer C; Grynberg M
Bull Cancer; 2015 May; 102(5):443-53. PubMed ID: 25739327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Oncofertility and breast cancer].
Sonigo C; Grynberg M; Bringer S; Sermondade N
Bull Cancer; 2019 Dec; 106(12S1):S43-S52. PubMed ID: 32008738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of malignancies on fertility preservation outcomes and relevant cryobiological advances.
Liu D; Yan J; Qiao J
Sci China Life Sci; 2020 Feb; 63(2):217-227. PubMed ID: 31197760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Survey Study of Attitude and Knowledge Regarding Female Fertility Preservation Among Reproductive Health Professionals in Fujian, China.
Ju K; Kopp M; Wang Y; Yuan G; Zheng W; Ataman LM; Woodruff TK; Chen Q; Xiao S
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol; 2019 Feb; 8(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 30312134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Timing of fertility preservation procedures in a cohort of female patients with cancer.
Jenninga E; Louwe LA; Peters AA; Nortier JW; Hilders CG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Feb; 160(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 22137982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of cancer stage and grade on fertility preservation outcome and ovarian stimulation response.
Volodarsky-Perel A; Cohen Y; Arab S; Son WY; Suarthana E; Dahan MH; Tulandi T; Buckett W
Hum Reprod; 2019 Mar; 34(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 30689898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
