149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32285032)
1. Comparison of Qualitative and Volumetric Assessments of Breast Density and Analyses of Breast Compression Parameters and Breast Volume of Women in Bahcesehir Mammography Screening Project.
Gemici AA; Arıbal E; Özaydın AN; Gürdal SÖ; Özçınar B; Cabioğlu N; Özmen V
Eur J Breast Health; 2020 Apr; 16(2):110-116. PubMed ID: 32285032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment.
Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Kim JA
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 32910685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of variability in breast density assessment by BI-RADS category according to the level of experience.
Eom HJ; Cha JH; Kang JW; Choi WJ; Kim HJ; Go E
Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):527-532. PubMed ID: 28766978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Visually Assessed BI-RADS Breast Density and Automated Volumetric Breast Density Software: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Breast Cancer Screening Setting.
van der Waal D; den Heeten GJ; Pijnappel RM; Schuur KH; Timmers JM; Verbeek AL; Broeders MJ
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136667. PubMed ID: 26335569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of inter- and intra-observer variability of breast density assessments using the fourth and fifth editions of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Alikhassi A; Esmaili Gourabi H; Baikpour M
Eur J Radiol Open; 2018; 5():67-72. PubMed ID: 29707614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast tissue composition: a longitudinal mammographic study with automated volumetric measurement.
Jang HJ; Kim HJ; Chae YS; Lee SJ; Kim SH; Lee H; Kim WH
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4785-4794. PubMed ID: 32314056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of breast density assessments according to BI-RADS 4th and 5th editions and experience level.
Gemici AA; Bayram E; Hocaoglu E; Inci E
Acta Radiol Open; 2020 Jul; 9(7):2058460120937381. PubMed ID: 32733694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.
Wanders JOP; Holland K; Karssemeijer N; Peeters PHM; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; van Gils CH
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jun; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 28583146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast tissue density change after oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carrier patients using visual and volumetric analysis.
Lecler A; Dunant A; Delaloge S; Wehrer D; Moussa T; Caron O; Balleyguier C
Br J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 91(1083):20170163. PubMed ID: 29182397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists' visual assessment: analysis of clinical-radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them.
Lee HN; Sohn YM; Han KH
Acta Radiol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25338836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Persistent inter-observer variability of breast density assessment using BI-RADS® 5th edition guidelines.
Portnow LH; Georgian-Smith D; Haider I; Barrios M; Bay CP; Nelson KP; Raza S
Clin Imaging; 2022 Mar; 83():21-27. PubMed ID: 34952487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic density and interval cancers in mammographic screening: Moving towards more personalized screening.
Larsen M; Lynge E; Lee CI; Lång K; Hofvind S
Breast; 2023 Jun; 69():306-311. PubMed ID: 36966656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic density assessment: comparison of radiologists, automated volumetric measurement, and artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis.
Eom HJ; Cha JH; Choi WJ; Cho SM; Jin K; Kim HH
Acta Radiol; 2024 Jun; ():2841851241257794. PubMed ID: 38825883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The mammographic breast density distribution of Finnish women with breast cancer and comparison of breast density reporting using the 4
Nykänen A; Okuma H; Sutela A; Masarwah A; Vanninen R; Sudah M
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 137():109585. PubMed ID: 33607373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
