149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32285032)
21. The mammographic breast density distribution of Finnish women with breast cancer and comparison of breast density reporting using the 4
Nykänen A; Okuma H; Sutela A; Masarwah A; Vanninen R; Sudah M
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 137():109585. PubMed ID: 33607373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Breast density (BD) assessment with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): Agreement between Quantra™ and 5th edition BI-RADS
Ekpo EU; Mello-Thoms C; Rickard M; Brennan PC; McEntee MF
Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():185-190. PubMed ID: 27769015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI.
Wang J; Azziz A; Fan B; Malkov S; Klifa C; Newitt D; Yitta S; Hylton N; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd JA
PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e81653. PubMed ID: 24324712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Determinants of volumetric breast density in Chilean premenopausal women.
Pereira A; Garmendia ML; Uauy R; Neira P; Lopez-Arana S; Malkov S; Shepherd J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Apr; 162(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 28132392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists.
Damases CN; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 26514436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Using an automated measure of breast density to explore the association between ethnicity and mammographic density in Australian women.
Bell RJ; Evans J; Fox J; Pridmore V
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 63(2):183-189. PubMed ID: 30623584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Automated volumetric breast density estimation: a comparison with visual assessment.
Seo JM; Ko ES; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hahn SY
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jul; 68(7):690-5. PubMed ID: 23434202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density.
Moshina N; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Ursin G; Hofvind S
Acta Radiol; 2018 Feb; 59(2):154-160. PubMed ID: 28565960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast Density Evaluation According to BI-RADS 5th Edition on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: AI Automated Assessment Versus Human Visual Assessment.
Tari DU; Santonastaso R; De Lucia DR; Santarsiere M; Pinto F
J Pers Med; 2023 Mar; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 37108994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.
Moshina N; Aase HS; Danielsen AS; Haldorsen IS; Lee CI; Zackrisson S; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):522-531. PubMed ID: 32930649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Inter-observer variability in mammographic density assessment using Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) synoptic scales.
Damases CN; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jun; 60(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 27059785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of automated volumetric breast density software in comparison with visual assessments in an Asian population: A retrospective observational study.
Rahmat K; Ab Mumin N; Ramli Hamid MT; Fadzli F; Ng WL; Muhammad Gowdh NF
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Sep; 99(39):e22405. PubMed ID: 32991467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in determining breast density according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS® Atlas.
Pesce K; Tajerian M; Chico MJ; Swiecicki MP; Boietti B; Frangella MJ; Benitez S
Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2020; 62(6):481-486. PubMed ID: 32493654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automated Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Measurements May Underestimate Percent Breast Density for High-density Breasts.
Rahbar K; Gubern-Merida A; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1561-1569. PubMed ID: 28754209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Can quantitative evaluation of mammographic breast density, "volumetric measurement", predict the masking risk with dense breast tissue? Investigation by comparison with subjective visual estimation by Japanese radiologists.
Oiwa M; Endo T; Suda N; Morita T; Sato Y; Kawasaki T; Ichihara S
Breast Cancer; 2019 May; 26(3):349-358. PubMed ID: 30387023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk in the Saudi population: a case-control study using visual and automated methods.
Aloufi AS; AlNaeem AN; Almousa AS; Hashem AM; Malik MA; Altahan FM; Elsharkawi MM; Almasar KA; ElMahdy MH; Squires SE; Alzimami KS; Harkness EF; Astley SM
Br J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 95(1134):20211197. PubMed ID: 35195439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Reliability Comparison of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Mammography: Breast Density Assessment Referring to the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
Ma Y; Cao Y; Liu A; Yin L; Han P; Li H; Zhang X; Ye Z
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):752-759. PubMed ID: 30220584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
Ekpo EU; Ujong UP; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1119-23. PubMed ID: 26999655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps.
Holland K; van Gils CH; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Apr; 162(3):541-548. PubMed ID: 28161786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
