These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32285723)

  • 1. Higher risk of revision for partial knee replacements in low absolute volume hospitals: data from 18,134 partial knee replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
    van Oost I; Koenraadt KLM; van Steenbergen LN; Bolder SBT; van Geenen RCI
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Aug; 91(4):426-432. PubMed ID: 32285723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nationwide partial knee replacement uptake is influenced by volume and supplier--A Dutch arthroplasty register study.
    Koenraadt-van Oost I; Koenraadt KL; Hoorntje A; van Steenbergen LN; Bolder SB; van Geenen RC
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2022; 30(3):10225536221144726. PubMed ID: 36508684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five-Year Survival of 20,946 Unicondylar Knee Replacements and Patient Risk Factors for Failure: An Analysis of German Insurance Data.
    Jeschke E; Gehrke T; Günster C; Hassenpflug J; Malzahn J; Niethard FU; Schräder P; Zacher J; Halder A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(20):1691-1698. PubMed ID: 27869619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements.
    Baker P; Jameson S; Critchley R; Reed M; Gregg P; Deehan D
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Apr; 95(8):702-9. PubMed ID: 23595068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of hospital volume on revision rate after total knee arthroplasty with cement.
    Badawy M; Espehaug B; Indrekvam K; Engesæter LB; Havelin LI; Furnes O
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep; 95(18):e131. PubMed ID: 24048562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. No difference in the use of revision components and rerevision rate in conversion to total knee replacement following Oxford Partial Knee Microplasty Instrumentation: a registry study of 529 conversions.
    Van Langeveld SJ; Janssen SJ; Koenraadt KLM; Van den Hout JAAM; Van Steenbergen LN; Van Geenen RCI
    Acta Orthop; 2023 Jul; 94():387-392. PubMed ID: 37519250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Impact of Case Numbers on the 5-Year Survival Rate of Unicondylar Knee Replacements in Germany].
    Jeschke E; Gehrke T; Günster C; Heller KD; Malzahn J; Marx A; Niethard FU; Schräder P; Zacher J; Halder AM
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2018 Feb; 156(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 28834999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.
    Badawy M; Espehaug B; Indrekvam K; Havelin LI; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2014 Aug; 85(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 24847789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time trends in case-mix and risk of revision following hip and knee arthroplasty in public and private hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis based on 476,312 procedures from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
    Van Dooren BJ; Bos P; Peters RM; Van Steenbergen LN; De Visser E; Brinkman JM; Schreurs BW; Zijlstra WP
    Acta Orthop; 2024 Jun; 95():307-318. PubMed ID: 38884413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital volume and the risk of revision in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the Nordic countries -an observational study of 14,496 cases.
    Badawy M; Fenstad AM; Bartz-Johannessen CA; Indrekvam K; Havelin LI; Robertsson O; W-Dahl A; Eskelinen A; Mäkelä K; Pedersen AB; Schrøder HM; Furnes O
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Sep; 18(1):388. PubMed ID: 28882132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Surgical Caseload on Revision Rate Following Total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.
    Liddle AD; Pandit H; Judge A; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26738897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary constrained and hinged total knee arthroplasty: 2- and 5-year revision risk compared with unconstrained total knee arthroplasty: a report on 401 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2017.
    Badawy M; Fenstad AM; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):467-472. PubMed ID: 31210080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgeon, implant, and patient variables may explain variability in early revision rates reported for unicompartmental arthroplasty.
    Bini S; Khatod M; Cafri G; Chen Y; Paxton EW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Dec; 95(24):2195-202. PubMed ID: 24352773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in Risk of Revision and Mortality Between Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The Influence of Hospital Volume.
    Arias-de la Torre J; Valderas JM; Evans JP; Martín V; Molina AJ; Muñoz L; Pons-Cabrafiga M; Espallargues M;
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 May; 34(5):865-871. PubMed ID: 30772112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of hospital case volume on re-revision following revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Yapp LZ; Walmsley PJ; Moran M; Clarke JV; Simpson AHRW; Scott CEH
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Apr; 103-B(4):602-609. PubMed ID: 33789471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. All-Polyethylene Versus Metal-Backed Tibial Components-An Analysis of 27,733 Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacements from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register.
    Gudnason A; Hailer NP; W-Dahl A; Sundberg M; Robertsson O
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jun; 96(12):994-999. PubMed ID: 24951734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of fixation type on the survivorship of contemporary total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years of age: a register-based study of 115,177 knees in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) 2000-2016.
    Niemeläinen MJ; Mäkelä KT; Robertsson O; W-Dahl A; Furnes O; Fenstad AM; Pedersen AB; Schrøder HM; Reito A; Eskelinen A
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Apr; 91(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 31928097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement.
    Furnes O; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Vollset SE; Engesaeter LB; Havelin LI
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Mar; 89(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17332100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ASA class is associated with early revision and reoperation after total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of the Geneva and Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registries.
    Ferguson RJ; Silman AJ; Combescure C; Bulow E; Odin D; Hannouche D; Glyn-Jones S; Rolfson O; Lübbeke A
    Acta Orthop; 2019 Aug; 90(4):324-330. PubMed ID: 31035846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conventional Versus Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Primary Total Knee Replacement: A Comparison of Revision Rates Using Data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
    Partridge TCJ; Baker PN; Jameson SS; Mason J; Reed MR; Deehan DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Jan; 102(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31725123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.