These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32285983)
1. A Randomized, Split-Face, Double-Blind Comparison Trial Between Fractionated Frequency-Doubled 1064/532 nm Picosecond Nd:YAG Laser and Fractionated 1927 nm Thulium Fiber Laser for Facial Photorejuvenation. Wu DC; Jones IT; Boen M; Al-Haddad M; Goldman MP Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Feb; 53(2):204-211. PubMed ID: 32285983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy and safety of 755-nm picosecond alexandrite laser with topical tranexamic acid versus laser monotherapy for melasma and facial rejuvenation: a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, split-face study in Chinese patients. Li Y; Yao C; Zhang H; Li L; Song Y Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Sep; 37(7):2879-2887. PubMed ID: 35501519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized, single-blind, study evaluating a 755-nm picosecond pulsed Alexandrite laser vs. a non-ablative 1927-nm fractionated thulium laser for the treatment of facial photopigmentation and aging. Serra M; Bohnert K; Sadick N J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2018 Oct; 20(6):335-340. PubMed ID: 30019970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and safety of picosecond 755-nm alexandrite laser with diffractive lens array for non-ablative rejuvenation in Chinese skin. Wat H; Yee-Nam Shek S; Yeung CK; Chan HH Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Jan; 51(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 30152538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective, randomized, evaluator-blinded study of the long pulse 532-nm KTP laser alone or in combination with the long pulse 1064-nm Nd: YAG laser on facial rejuvenation in Asian skin. Negishi K; Tanaka S; Tobita S Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Nov; 48(9):844-851. PubMed ID: 27605491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rejuvenation of the male scalp using 1,927 nm non-ablative fractional thulium fiber laser. Boen M; Wilson MJV; Goldman MP; Wu DC Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Jul; 49(5):475-479. PubMed ID: 28117489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fractionated frequency-doubled 1,064/532 nm picosecond Nd:YAG lasers and non-ablative fractional 1,540 nm Er: glass in the treatment of facial atrophic scars: a randomized, split-face, double-blind trial. Shi Y; Jiang W; Li W; Zhang W; Zou Y Ann Transl Med; 2021 May; 9(10):862. PubMed ID: 34164496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and safety of long pulse Nd:YAG laser versus fractional erbium:YAG laser in the treatment of facial skin wrinkles. Dadkhahfar S; Fadakar K; Robati RM Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Apr; 34(3):457-464. PubMed ID: 30117052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-Year Results of Facial Photoaging in Asian Patients After Alexandrite 755 nm Picosecond Laser With Diffractive Lens Array: A Split-Face, Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Comparison. Yu W; Zhu J; Yu W; Shang Y; Lyu D; Lin X; Xu H; Zhang Z Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Oct; 53(8):1065-1072. PubMed ID: 33604905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combination 532-nm and 1064-nm lasers for noninvasive skin rejuvenation and toning. Lee MW Arch Dermatol; 2003 Oct; 139(10):1265-76. PubMed ID: 14568830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective studies of the efficacy and safety of the picosecond 755, 1,064, and 532 nm lasers for the treatment of infraorbital dark circles. Vanaman Wilson MJ; Jones IT; Bolton J; Larsen L; Wu DC; Goldman MP Lasers Surg Med; 2018 Jan; 50(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 29135036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and efficacy of a novel diffractive lens array using a picosecond 755 nm alexandrite laser for treatment of wrinkles. Weiss RA; McDaniel DH; Weiss MA; Mahoney AM; Beasley KL; Halvorson CR Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Jan; 49(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 27681221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of intense pulsed light with 1,927-nm fractionated thulium fiber laser for the rejuvenation of the chest. Wu DC; Friedmann DP; Fabi SG; Goldman MP; Fitzpatrick RE Dermatol Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 24354711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-Center, Prospective, Double-Blind, Evaluator-Blind, non-Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Trial With a 1927 Nm Non-Ablative Fractionated Laser and Topical 0.05% Tretinoin Lotion for Facial Dyspigmentation and Photodamage. Almukhtar R; Carr E; Angra K; Lipp M; Boesn M; Goldman M J Drugs Dermatol; 2021 Nov; 20(11):1174-1179. PubMed ID: 34784124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Split-face comparison of the picosecond 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser using a microlens array and the quasi-long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for treatment of photoaging facial wrinkles and pores in Asians. Yim S; Lee YH; Choi YJ; Kim WS Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(4):949-956. PubMed ID: 31734761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Facial rejuvenation via the sequential combined use of multiple laser modalities: Safety and efficacy. Wu DC; Fitzpatrick RE Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Aug; 48(6):577-83. PubMed ID: 27060688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fractional 1064 nm Picosecond Laser in Treatment of Melasma and Skin Rejuvenation in Asians, A Prospective Study. Wong CSM; Chan MWM; Shek SYN; Yeung CK; Chan HHL Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Oct; 53(8):1032-1042. PubMed ID: 33544930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of pigmentary disorders in patients with skin of color with a novel 755 nm picosecond, Q-switched ruby, and Q-switched Nd:YAG nanosecond lasers: A retrospective photographic review. Levin MK; Ng E; Bae YS; Brauer JA; Geronemus RG Lasers Surg Med; 2016 Feb; 48(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 26922302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the fractionated Nd: YAG 1064-nm picosecond laser with holographic optics and the fractional CO Yuan Y; He Y; Fang J; Zhang M; Wu Q Int J Dermatol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38924534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]