These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32287297)

  • 1. Identifying obstacles preventing the uptake of tunnel handling methods for laboratory mice: An international thematic survey.
    Henderson LJ; Smulders TV; Roughan JV
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231454. PubMed ID: 32287297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefits of tunnel handling persist after repeated restraint, injection and anaesthesia.
    Henderson LJ; Dani B; Serrano EMN; Smulders TV; Roughan JV
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):14562. PubMed ID: 32884048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tail handling of lab mice could become a thing of the past.
    Vet Rec; 2019 Oct; 185(14):424-425. PubMed ID: 31604854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing mouse anxiety during handling: effect of experience with handling tunnels.
    Gouveia K; Hurst JL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66401. PubMed ID: 23840458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Refinements to Handling and Restraint Methods in Mice.
    Davies JR; Purawijaya DA; Bartlett JM; Robinson ESJ
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Aug; 12(17):. PubMed ID: 36077894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the practicality of using non-aversive handling methods to reduce background stress and anxiety in laboratory mice.
    Gouveia K; Hurst JL
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):20305. PubMed ID: 31889107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of handling technique and handling frequency on laboratory mouse welfare is sex-specific.
    Sensini F; Inta D; Palme R; Brandwein C; Pfeiffer N; Riva MA; Gass P; Mallien AS
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17281. PubMed ID: 33057118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tunnel use facilitates handling of ICR mice and decreases experimental variation.
    Nakamura Y; Suzuki K
    J Vet Med Sci; 2018 Jun; 80(6):886-892. PubMed ID: 29657231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Handling method affects measures of anxiety, but not chronic stress in mice.
    Novak J; Jaric I; Rosso M; Rufener R; Touma C; Würbel H
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):20938. PubMed ID: 36463282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-aversive mouse handling techniques: A survey on the acceptance and concerns of the animal facility and scientific staff.
    Hohlbaum K; Humpenöder M; Nagel-Riedasch S; Ullmann K; Thöne-Reineke C
    ALTEX; 2020; 37(4):671-674. PubMed ID: 33080035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimising reliability of mouse performance in behavioural testing: the major role of non-aversive handling.
    Gouveia K; Hurst JL
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():44999. PubMed ID: 28322308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of non-aversive versus tail-lift handling on breeding productivity in a C57BL/6J mouse colony.
    Hull MA; Reynolds PS; Nunamaker EA
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0263192. PubMed ID: 35089969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Survey of Rabbit Handling Methods Within the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland.
    Oxley JA; Ellis CF; McBride EA; McCormick WD
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2019; 22(3):207-218. PubMed ID: 29695170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Olfactory variation in mouse husbandry and its implications for refinement and standardization: UK survey of non-animal scents.
    López-Salesansky N; Mazlan NH; Whitfield LE; Wells DJ; Burn CC
    Lab Anim; 2016 Aug; 50(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 26561578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Survey of Laboratory Animal Veterinarians Regarding Mouse Welfare in Biomedical Research.
    Marx JO; Jacobsen KO; Petervary NA; Casebolt DB
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 60(2):139-145. PubMed ID: 33371930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuroinflammation, body temperature and behavioural changes in CD1 male mice undergoing acute restraint stress: An exploratory study.
    Redaelli V; Bosi A; Luzi F; Cappella P; Zerbi P; Ludwig N; Di Lernia D; Roughan JV; Porcu L; Soranna D; Parati G; Calvillo L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259938. PubMed ID: 34780550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A survey of straw use and tail biting in Swedish pig farms rearing undocked pigs.
    Wallgren T; Westin R; Gunnarsson S
    Acta Vet Scand; 2016 Dec; 58(1):84. PubMed ID: 27919291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human-animal interactions and safety during dairy cattle handling--Comparing moving cows to milking and hoof trimming.
    Lindahl C; Pinzke S; Herlin A; Keeling LJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2131-2141. PubMed ID: 26778308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Welfare and Scientific Considerations of Tattooing and Ear Tagging for Mouse Identification.
    Roughan JV; Sevenoaks T
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 58(2):142-153. PubMed ID: 30813985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using refined methods to pick up mice: A survey benchmarking prevalence & beliefs about tunnel and cup handling.
    Young L; Goldsteen D; Nunamaker EA; Prescott MJ; Reynolds P; Thompson-Iritani S; Thurston SE; Martin TL; LaFollette MR
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(9):e0288010. PubMed ID: 37676886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.