These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32287302)

  • 1. The effect of anchors and social information on behaviour.
    O'Garra T; Sisco MR
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231203. PubMed ID: 32287302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of $1, $5 and $10 stakes in an online dictator game.
    Raihani NJ; Mace R; Lamba S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e73131. PubMed ID: 23951342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Information sharing for a coordination game in fluctuating environments.
    Paarporn K; Eksin C; Weitz JS
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Oct; 454():376-385. PubMed ID: 29964065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Between Joy and Sympathy: Smiling and Sad Recipient Faces Increase Prosocial Behavior in the Dictator Game.
    Weiß M; Hein G; Hewig J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(11):. PubMed ID: 34200370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of outcome- and process-based social preferences and beliefs in Dictator Games and sequential Prisoner's Dilemmas.
    Aksoy O; Weesie J
    Soc Sci Res; 2014 May; 45():98-116. PubMed ID: 24576630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gamble for the needy! Does identifiability enhances donation?
    Wyszynski M; Diederich A; Ritov I
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234336. PubMed ID: 32603364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dictator Game Giving: The Importance of Descriptive versus Injunctive Norms.
    Raihani NJ; McAuliffe K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e113826. PubMed ID: 25493945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Small groups and long memories promote cooperation.
    Stewart AJ; Plotkin JB
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():26889. PubMed ID: 27247059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variation in cooperative behaviour within a single city.
    Nettle D; Colléony A; Cockerill M
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e26922. PubMed ID: 22046411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interplay between sharing behavior and beliefs about others in children during dictator games.
    Santamaría-García H; González-Gadea ML; Di Tella R; Ibáñez A; Sigman M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():451-464. PubMed ID: 29059605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social evaluation-induced amylase elevation and economic decision-making in the dictator game in humans.
    Takahashi T; Ikeda K; Hasegawa T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2007 Oct; 28(5):662-5. PubMed ID: 17984929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game.
    Perc M; Szolnoki A
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Jan; 77(1 Pt 1):011904. PubMed ID: 18351873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A functional MRI study on how oxytocin affects decision making in social dilemmas: Cooperate as long as it pays off, aggress only when you think you can win.
    Lambert B; Declerck CH; Boone C; Parizel PM
    Horm Behav; 2017 Aug; 94():145-152. PubMed ID: 28676252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting behavior in economic games by looking through the eyes of the players.
    Mellers BA; Haselhuhn MP; Tetlock PE; Silva JC; Isen AM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Nov; 139(4):743-55. PubMed ID: 20853991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individuals in the criminal justice system show differences in cooperative behaviour: Implications from cooperative games.
    Clark BC; Thorne CB; Hendricks PS; Sharp C; Clark SK; Cropsey KL
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2015 Jul; 25(3):169-80. PubMed ID: 24910424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proportion offered in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games decreases with amount and social distance.
    Bechler C; Green L; Myerson J
    Behav Processes; 2015 Jun; 115():149-55. PubMed ID: 25862989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in allocation of funds in the dictator game associated with length of the arginine vasopressin 1a receptor RS3 promoter region and correlation between RS3 length and hippocampal mRNA.
    Knafo A; Israel S; Darvasi A; Bachner-Melman R; Uzefovsky F; Cohen L; Feldman E; Lerer E; Laiba E; Raz Y; Nemanov L; Gritsenko I; Dina C; Agam G; Dean B; Bornstein G; Ebstein RP
    Genes Brain Behav; 2008 Apr; 7(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 17696996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioural consequences of regret and disappointment in social bargaining games.
    Martinez LM; Zeelenberg M; Rijsman JB
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Feb; 25(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 21432677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Equality over intentionality: The normative social preferences of neutral third-parties.
    Bosch-Rosa C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0205240. PubMed ID: 30427848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.