These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32287372)

  • 1. Collection efficiencies of aerosol samplers for virus-containing aerosols.
    Tseng CC; Li CS
    J Aerosol Sci; 2005; 36(5):593-607. PubMed ID: 32287372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV).
    Zhao Y; Aarnink AJ; Wang W; Fabri T; Groot Koerkamp PW; de Jong MC
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2014; 21(3):464-71. PubMed ID: 25292111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Storage effects on bacterial concentration: determination of impinger and filter samples.
    Li CS; Lin YC
    Sci Total Environ; 2001 Oct; 278(1-3):231-7. PubMed ID: 11669271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus-infected ferrets.
    Bekking C; Yip L; Groulx N; Doggett N; Finn M; Mubareka S
    Influenza Other Respir Viruses; 2019 Nov; 13(6):564-573. PubMed ID: 31541519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of storage on the fungal concentration determination of impinger and filter samples.
    Lin WH; Li CS
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 12570402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of samplers collecting airborne influenza viruses: 1. Primarily impingers and cyclones.
    Raynor PC; Adesina A; Aboubakr HA; Yang M; Torremorell M; Goyal SM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244977. PubMed ID: 33507951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Artificially Generated Aerosols of Pure Cultures in a Controlled Environment.
    Kang YJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1989 Aug; 52(8):560-563. PubMed ID: 31003329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of eight bioaerosol samplers challenged with aerosols of free bacteria.
    Jensen PA; Todd WF; Davis GN; Scarpino PV
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Oct; 53(10):660-7. PubMed ID: 1456208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Personal air samplers for measuring occupational exposures to biological hazards.
    Macher JM; First MW
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Feb; 45(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 6702610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Air Samplers for Recovery of Biological Aerosols in Dairy Processing Plants.
    Kang YJ; Frank JF
    J Food Prot; 1989 Sep; 52(9):655-659. PubMed ID: 31003282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of four sampling devices for Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies.
    Schuit M; Gardner S; Taylor J; Dabisch P
    PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2021 Feb; 15(2):e0009001. PubMed ID: 33524051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Airborne influenza virus detection with four aerosol samplers using molecular and infectivity assays: considerations for a new infectious virus aerosol sampler.
    Fabian P; McDevitt JJ; Houseman EA; Milton DK
    Indoor Air; 2009 Oct; 19(5):433-41. PubMed ID: 19689447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three air samplers for the collection of four nebulized respiratory viruses - Collection of respiratory viruses from air.
    Kutter JS; de Meulder D; Bestebroer TM; Mulders A; Fouchier RAM; Herfst S
    Indoor Air; 2021 Nov; 31(6):1874-1885. PubMed ID: 34124803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sampling methodologies and dosage assessment techniques for submicrometre and ultrafine virus aerosol particles.
    Hogan CJ; Kettleson EM; Lee MH; Ramaswami B; Angenent LT; Biswas P
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(6):1422-34. PubMed ID: 16313415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of bioaerosol sampling techniques for the detection of Chlamydophila psittaci in contaminated air.
    Van Droogenbroeck C; Van Risseghem M; Braeckman L; Vanrompay D
    Vet Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 135(1-2):31-7. PubMed ID: 18963601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of viable antibiotic-resistant/sensitive Acinetobacter baumannii in indoor air by propidium monoazide quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
    Tseng CC; Hsiao PK; Chang KC; Cheng CC; Yiin LM; Hsieh CJ
    Indoor Air; 2015 Oct; 25(5):475-87. PubMed ID: 25283547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Four Aerobiological Sampling Methods for the Retrieval of Aerosolized Pseudomonas syringae.
    Buttner MP; Stetzenbach LD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1991 Apr; 57(4):1268-70. PubMed ID: 16348468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of reaerosolization from impingers in an effort to improve airborne virus sampling.
    Riemenschneider L; Woo MH; Wu CY; Lundgren D; Wander J; Lee JH; Li HW; Heimbuch B
    J Appl Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 108(1):315-24. PubMed ID: 20002911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bioaerosol and surface sampling for the surveillance of influenza A virus in swine.
    Prost K; Kloeze H; Mukhi S; Bozek K; Poljak Z; Mubareka S
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2019 May; 66(3):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 30715792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the performance of 3 bioaerosol samplers for influenza virus.
    Li J; Leavey A; Wang Y; O'Neil C; Wallace MA; Burnham CD; Boon AC; Babcock H; Biswas P
    J Aerosol Sci; 2018 Jan; 115():133-145. PubMed ID: 32287370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.