These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32287372)

  • 41. Development and Performance Evaluation of an Exhaled-Breath Bioaerosol Collector for Influenza Virus.
    McDevitt JJ; Koutrakis P; Ferguson ST; Wolfson JM; Fabian MP; Martins M; Pantelic J; Milton DK
    Aerosol Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 47(4):444-451. PubMed ID: 23418400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Impact of relative humidity and collection media on mycobacteriophage D29 aerosol.
    Liu K; Wen Z; Li N; Yang W; Wang J; Hu L; Dong X; Lu J; Li J
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2012 Mar; 78(5):1466-72. PubMed ID: 22194291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of four bioaerosol samplers in the outdoor environment.
    Cage BR; Schreiber K; Barnes C; Portnoy J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Nov; 77(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 8933779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Detection of Viruses from Bioaerosols Using Anion Exchange Resin.
    Schaeffer JW; Chandler JC; Davidson M; Magzamen SL; Pérez-Méndez A; Reynolds SJ; Goodridge LD; Volckens J; Franklin AB; Shriner SA; Bisha B
    J Vis Exp; 2018 Aug; (138):. PubMed ID: 30199022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Personal size-separating impactor for sampling microbiological aerosols.
    Macher JM; Hansson HC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jul; 48(7):652-5. PubMed ID: 3618478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of endotoxin exposure assessment by bioaerosol impinger and filter-sampling methods.
    Duchaine C; Thorne PS; Mériaux A; Grimard Y; Whitten P; Cormier Y
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 67(6):2775-80. PubMed ID: 11375194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of filter material on bioaerosol collection of Bacillus subtilis spores used as a Bacillus anthracis simulant.
    Clark Burton N; Adhikari A; Grinshpun SA; Hornung R; Reponen T
    J Environ Monit; 2005 May; 7(5):475-80. PubMed ID: 15877169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of the Filter Efficiency of Medical Nonwoven Fabrics against Three Different Microbe Aerosols.
    Shimasaki N; Okaue A; Kikuno R; Shinohara K
    Biocontrol Sci; 2018; 23(2):61-69. PubMed ID: 29910210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of Particulate Air Samplers for Detection of Airborne Aspergillus flavus Spores.
    Silas JC; Harrison MA; Carpenter JA; Floyd JB
    J Food Prot; 1986 Mar; 49(3):236-238. PubMed ID: 30959724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of high-volume air sampling equipment for viral aerosol sampling during emergency response.
    Cooper C; Slagley J; Lohaus J; Escamilla E; Bliss C; Semler D; Felker D; Smith D; Ott D
    J Emerg Manag; 2014; 12(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 24828912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Size-separated sampling and analysis of isocyanates in workplace aerosols. Part I. Denuder--cascade impactor sampler.
    Dahlin J; Spanne M; Karlsson D; Dalene M; Skarping G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Jul; 52(5):361-74. PubMed ID: 18458354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Performance characteristics of PM10 samplers under calm air conditions.
    Lai CY; Chen CC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Apr; 50(4):578-87. PubMed ID: 10786010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Use of two different acidic aerosol samplers to measure acidic aerosols in Hsinchu, Taiwan.
    Tsai CJ; Perng SB; Chiou SF
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Dec; 50(12):2120-8. PubMed ID: 11153491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of two biological aerosol sampling methods.
    Zimmerman NJ; Reist PC; Turner AG
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 Jan; 53(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 3548593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Viral shedding and emission of airborne infectious bursal disease virus from a broiler room.
    Zhao Y; Aarnink AJ; Cambra-Lopez M; Fabri T
    Br Poult Sci; 2013; 54(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 23444858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Performance of Air-O-Cell, Burkard, and Button Samplers for total enumeration of airborne spores.
    Aizenberg V; Reponen T; Grinshpun SA; Willeke K
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 11192220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Use of Two Different Acidic Aerosol Samplers To Measure Acidic Aerosols in Hsinchu, Taiwan.
    Tsai CJ; Perng SB; Chiou SF
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Dec; 50(12):2120-2128. PubMed ID: 28075256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A wind tunnel test of newly developed personal bioaerosol samplers.
    Su WC; Tolchinsky AD; Sigaev VI; Cheng YS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Jul; 62(7):828-37. PubMed ID: 22866584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.