These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32287963)

  • 1. A methodology for optimal placement of sensors in enclosed environments: A dynamical systems approach.
    Fontanini AD; Vaidya U; Ganapathysubramanian B
    Build Environ; 2016 May; 100():145-161. PubMed ID: 32287963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constructing Markov matrices for real-time transient contaminant transport analysis for indoor environments.
    Fontanini AD; Vaidya U; Ganapathysubramanian B
    Build Environ; 2015 Dec; 94():68-81. PubMed ID: 32288034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Location identification for indoor instantaneous point contaminant source by probability-based inverse Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling.
    Liu X; Zhai Z
    Indoor Air; 2008 Feb; 18(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 18211477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of contaminant sources in enclosed spaces by a single sensor.
    Zhang T; Chen Q
    Indoor Air; 2007 Dec; 17(6):439-49. PubMed ID: 18045268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-objective optimization for sensor placement against suddenly released contaminant in air duct system.
    Gao J; Zeng L; Cao C; Ye W; Zhang X
    Build Simul; 2018; 11(1):139-153. PubMed ID: 32218901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of cabin conditions on placement and response of contaminant detection sensors in a commercial aircraft.
    Mazumdar S; Chen Q
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Jan; 10(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 18175019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of contaminant sources in enclosed environments by inverse CFD modeling.
    Zhang TF; Chen Q
    Indoor Air; 2007 Jun; 17(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 17542830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of the Coverage and Accuracy of an Indoor Positioning System with a Variable Number of Sensors.
    Domingo-Perez F; Lazaro-Galilea JL; Bravo I; Gardel A; Rodriguez D
    Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jun; 16(6):. PubMed ID: 27338414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real-time identification of indoor pollutant source positions based on neural network locator of contaminant sources and optimized sensor networks.
    Vukovic V; Tabares-Velasco PC; Srebric J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Sep; 60(9):1034-48. PubMed ID: 20863049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the deployment of a connected sensor network for confident information coverage.
    Xu H; Zhu J; Wang B
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 May; 15(5):11277-94. PubMed ID: 26007715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Risk Assessment Approach for Evaluating the Impact of Toxic Contaminants Released Indoors by Considering Various Emergency Ventilation and Evacuation Strategies.
    Zeng L; Gao J; Wang Q; Chang L
    Risk Anal; 2018 Nov; 38(11):2379-2399. PubMed ID: 29975988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On Efficient Deployment of Wireless Sensors for Coverage and Connectivity in Constrained 3D Space.
    Wu CQ; Wang L
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Oct; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 28994749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensor Placement Optimization for Shape Sensing of Plates and Shells Using Genetic Algorithm and Inverse Finite Element Method.
    Ghasemzadeh M; Kefal A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36501955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A risk-based sensor placement methodology.
    Lee RW; Kulesz JJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Oct; 158(2-3):417-29. PubMed ID: 18343570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Network Distance-Based Simulated Annealing and Fuzzy Clustering for Sensor Placement Ensuring Observability and Minimal Relative Degree.
    Leitold D; Vathy-Fogarassy A; Abonyi J
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Sep; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 30223464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategic deployment in the deep: Principled underwater sensor placement optimization with three-dimensional acoustic map.
    Zhu X; Wang Y; Fang Z; Cheng L; Li J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 Oct; 156(4):2668-2685. PubMed ID: 39422479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the global resilience of water quality sensor placement strategies within water distribution systems.
    Zhang Q; Zheng F; Kapelan Z; Savic D; He G; Ma Y
    Water Res; 2020 Apr; 172():115527. PubMed ID: 32004913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Max-Flow Based Algorithm for Connected Target Coverage with Probabilistic Sensors.
    Shan A; Xu X; Cheng Z; Wang W
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 May; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28587084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simplified building airflow model for agent concentration prediction.
    Jacques DR; Smith DA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Nov; 7(11):640-50. PubMed ID: 20924933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.