These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32290810)

  • 1. Hybrid test for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2881-2899. PubMed ID: 32290810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The trim-and-fill method for publication bias: practical guidelines and recommendations based on a large database of meta-analyses.
    Shi L; Lin L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(23):e15987. PubMed ID: 31169736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H; Murad MH; Hong C; Qu Z; Cole SR; Chen Y
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 29663281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Lin L; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):785-794. PubMed ID: 29141096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian "fill-in" method for correcting for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Du H; Liu F; Wang L
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Dec; 22(4):799-817. PubMed ID: 29265851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THE EFFECT DIRECTION SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT WHEN ASSESSING SMALL-STUDY EFFECTS.
    Meng Z; Wu C; Lin L
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2023 Mar; 23(1):101830. PubMed ID: 36914304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for publication bias in diagnostic meta-analysis: a simulation study.
    Bürkner PC; Doebler P
    Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(18):3061-77. PubMed ID: 24753050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods for addressing publication bias in school psychology journals: A descriptive review of meta-analyses from 1980 to 2019.
    McClain MB; Callan GL; Harris B; Floyd RG; Haverkamp CR; Golson ME; Longhurst DN; Benallie KJ
    J Sch Psychol; 2021 Feb; 84():74-94. PubMed ID: 33581772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A modified regression method to test publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Jin ZC; Wu C; Zhou XH; He J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():132. PubMed ID: 25516509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
    Hattori S; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accounting for publication bias using a bivariate trim and fill meta-analysis procedure.
    Luo C; Marks-Anglin A; Duan R; Lin L; Hong C; Chu H; Chen Y
    Stat Med; 2022 Aug; 41(18):3466-3478. PubMed ID: 35574857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
    Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Ades AE; Stanley TD; Abrams KR; Peters JL; Cooper NJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan; 9():2. PubMed ID: 19138428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.
    Song F; Khan KS; Dinnes J; Sutton AJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 31(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 11914301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
    Saveleva E; Selinski S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.
    Friese M; Frankenbach J
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):456-471. PubMed ID: 31789538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.