403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32291736)
1. Comparison of different systems of ultrasound (US) risk stratification for malignancy in elderly patients with thyroid nodules. Real world experience.
Di Fermo F; Sforza N; Rosmarin M; Morosan Allo Y; Parisi C; Santamaria J; Pacenza N; Zuk C; Faingold C; Ferraro F; Meroño T; Brenta G
Endocrine; 2020 Aug; 69(2):331-338. PubMed ID: 32291736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differences between ATA, AACE/ACE/AME and ACR TI-RADS ultrasound classifications performance in identifying cytological high-risk thyroid nodules.
Lauria Pantano A; Maddaloni E; Briganti SI; Beretta Anguissola G; Perrella E; Taffon C; Palermo A; Pozzilli P; Manfrini S; Crescenzi A
Eur J Endocrinol; 2018 Jun; 178(6):595-603. PubMed ID: 29626008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Malignancy risk stratification and FNA recommendations for thyroid nodules: A comparison of ACR TI-RADS, AACE/ACE/AME and ATA guidelines.
Peng JY; Pan FS; Wang W; Wang Z; Shan QY; Lin JH; Luo J; Zheng YL; Hu HT; Ruan SM; Liang JY; Xie XY; Lu MD
Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(6):102625. PubMed ID: 32668355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The TNAPP web-based algorithm improves thyroid nodule management in clinical practice: A retrospective validation study.
Triggiani V; Lisco G; Renzulli G; Frasoldati A; Guglielmi R; Garber J; Papini E
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():1080159. PubMed ID: 36778596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Different Ultrasound Classification Systems of Thyroid Nodules for Identifying Malignant Potential: A Cross-sectional Study.
Chen H; Ye J; Song J; You Y; Chen W; Liu Y
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e2126. PubMed ID: 33503181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Multidisciplinary Head-to-Head Comparison of American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data System and American Thyroid Association Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems.
Huang BL; Ebner SA; Makkar JS; Bentley-Hibbert S; McConnell RJ; Lee JA; Hecht EM; Kuo JH
Oncologist; 2020 May; 25(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 31740569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 5 Thyroid Ultrasound Stratification Systems for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Nodules and to Avoid Biopsy Using Histology as Reference Standard.
Kuru B; Kefeli M; Danaci M
Endocr Pract; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 33930581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ACR TI-RADS and ATA US scores are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.
Barbosa TLM; Junior COM; Graf H; Cavalvanti T; Trippia MA; da Silveira Ugino RT; de Oliveira GL; Granella VH; de Carvalho GA
BMC Endocr Disord; 2019 Oct; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 31664992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Performance of Six Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Kim DH; Kim SW; Basurrah MA; Lee J; Hwang SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jun; 220(6):791-803. PubMed ID: 36752367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fine needle aspiration biopsy indications for thyroid nodules: compare a point-based risk stratification system with a pattern-based risk stratification system.
Ruan JL; Yang HY; Liu RB; Liang M; Han P; Xu XL; Luo BM
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4871-4878. PubMed ID: 30715590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does a higher American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) score forecast an increased risk of malignancy? A correlation study of ACR TI-RADS with FNA cytology in the evaluation of thyroid nodules.
Modi L; Sun W; Shafizadeh N; Negron R; Yee-Chang M; Zhou F; Simsir A; Sheth S; Brandler TC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Jul; 128(7):470-481. PubMed ID: 32078249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of TI-RADS and ATA classifications for predicting malignancy of thyroid nodules.
Şahin M; Oguz A; Tuzun D; Akkus G; Törün GI; Bahar AY; Şahin H; Gül K
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2021 Nov; 30(11):1133-1139. PubMed ID: 34510845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. USING THE ATA AND ACR TI-RADS SONOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATIONS AS ADJUNCTIVE PREDICTORS OF MALIGNANCY FOR INDETERMINATE THYROID NODULES.
Ahmadi S; Herbst R; Oyekunle T; Jiang X'; Strickland K; Roman S; Sosa JA
Endocr Pract; 2019 Sep; 25(9):908-917. PubMed ID: 31170369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ACR TI-RADS and ATA ultrasound classifications are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules located in the isthmus.
Cao J; Huang W; Huang P; Huang Y
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2022; 80(4):463-471. PubMed ID: 34864651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The diagnostic efficacy and inappropriate biopsy rate of ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines for thyroid nodules in children and adolescents.
Li G; Zhang B; Liu J; Xiong Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2023; 14():1052945. PubMed ID: 37051202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective Cohort Study of 1947 Thyroid Nodules: A Comparison of the 2017 American College of Radiology TI-RADS and the 2015 American Thyroid Association Classifications.
Pandya A; Caoili EM; Jawad-Makki F; Wasnik AP; Shankar PR; Bude R; Haymart MR; Davenport MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):900-906. PubMed ID: 32069084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Performance of ACR TI-RADS and ATA Guidelines in the Prediction of Thyroid Malignancy: A Prospective Single Tertiary Center Study and Literature Review.
Torshizian A; Hashemi F; Khoshhal N; Ghodsi A; Rastegar H; Mousavi Z; Dadgar Moghadam M; Mohebbi M
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 37761339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Diagnostic Efficacy of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System (TI-RADS) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules.
Chen F; Sun Y; Chen G; Luo Y; Xue G; Luo K; Ma H; Yao J; Zhu Z; Li G; Li Q
Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():9995962. PubMed ID: 35075371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive Value of Malignancy of Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Classification Systems: A Prospective Study.
Persichetti A; Di Stasio E; Guglielmi R; Bizzarri G; Taccogna S; Misischi I; Graziano F; Petrucci L; Bianchini A; Papini E
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2018 Apr; 103(4):1359-1368. PubMed ID: 29408952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A DIRECT COMPARISON OF THE ATA AND TI-RADS ULTRASOUND SCORING SYSTEMS.
Ahmadi S; Oyekunle T; Jiang X'; Scheri R; Perkins J; Stang M; Roman S; Sosa JA
Endocr Pract; 2019 May; 25(5):413-422. PubMed ID: 30720343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
