These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32292468)

  • 41. Comparative evaluation of the length of resin tags, viscosity and microleakage of pit and fissure sealants - an in vitro scanning electron microscope study.
    Prabhakar AR; Murthy SA; Sugandhan S
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2011 Oct; 2(4):324-30. PubMed ID: 22346161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of Solubility and Microleakage of Glass Carbomer Sealant.
    Subramaniam P; Girish Babu KL; Jayasurya S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 26551365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. In Vitro Evaluation of Different Protocols for Preventing Microleakage of Fissure Sealants Placed Following Saliva Contamination.
    Şimşek H; Yazıcı AR; Güngör HC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020 Aug; 44(4):240-248. PubMed ID: 33167017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Microleakage of Glass Ionomer-based Provisional Cement in CAD/CAM-Fabricated Interim Crowns: An in vitro Study.
    Farah RI; Al-Harethi N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Oct; 17(10):801-806. PubMed ID: 27794149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison between two glass-ionomer sealants placed using finger pressure (ART approach) and a ball burnisher.
    Beiruti N; Frencken JE; Mulder J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Jun; 19(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 16838480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth.
    Ahovuo-Saloranta A; Forss H; Walsh T; Hiiri A; Nordblad A; Mäkelä M; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar; (3):CD001830. PubMed ID: 23543512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Microleakage around glass-ceramic insert restorations luted with a high-viscous or flowable composite.
    Salim S; Santini A; Safar KN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(1):30-8; discussion 39. PubMed ID: 15934683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems.
    Nahvi A; Razavian A; Abedi H; Charati JY
    Eur J Dent; 2018; 12(2):242-246. PubMed ID: 29988227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
    Bansal D; Mahajan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vitro comparison of microleakage of two materials used as pit and fissure sealants.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Soleymani A; Heydari Z
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2011; 5(3):83-6. PubMed ID: 22991611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of Penetration Depth and Microleakage of Resin Infiltrant and Conventional Sealant in Pits and Fissures of Permanent Teeth
    Al Tuwirqi AA; Alshammari AM; Felemban OM; Ali Farsi NM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Nov; 20(11):1339-1344. PubMed ID: 31892688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Microleakage of conventional light-cure resin-based fissure sealant and resin-modified glass ionomer sealant after application of a fluoride varnish on demineralized enamel.
    Germán-Cecilia C; Gallego Reyes SM; Pérez Silva A; Serna Muñoz C; Ortiz-Ruiz AJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208856. PubMed ID: 30533062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant in children with special needs.
    Morales-Chávez MC; Nualart-Grollmus ZC
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2014 Dec; 6(5):e551-5. PubMed ID: 25674325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants: a report of 5-year-follow-up].
    Liu YJ; Chang Q; Rong WS; Zhao XL
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 53(7):437-442. PubMed ID: 29996359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Marginal leakage of two newer glass-ionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT.
    Chen X; Cuijpers V; Fan M; Frencken JE
    J Dent; 2010 Sep; 38(9):731-5. PubMed ID: 20580767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.
    Ahovuo-Saloranta A; Hiiri A; Nordblad A; Worthington H; Mäkelä M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001830. PubMed ID: 15266455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of microleakage in posterior nanocomposite restorations with adhesive liners.
    Simi B; Suprabha B
    J Conserv Dent; 2011 Apr; 14(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 21814362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.