These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32293358)
41. [Methods and conditions of fertility preservation in early-stage ovarian tumors]. Szatmári E; Máté S; Sipos N; Szánthó A; Silhavy M; Rigó J Orv Hetil; 2013 Apr; 154(14):523-30. PubMed ID: 23545230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. What women want: Fertility sparing surgery in Borderline ovarian tumours patients and pregnancy outcome. Candotti G; Peiretti M; Mangili G; Bergamini A; Candiani M; Cioffi R; Mais V; Rabaiotti E; Bocciolone L Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 46(5):888-892. PubMed ID: 31722834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Fertility preserving surgery for high-grade epithelial ovarian carcinoma confined to the ovary. Nasioudis D; Mastroyannis SA; Haggerty AF; Giuntoli RL; Morgan MA; Ko EM; Latif NA Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 May; 248():63-70. PubMed ID: 32182501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The impact of clinicopathologic and surgical factors on relapse and pregnancy in young patients (≤40 years old) with borderline ovarian tumors. Fang C; Zhao L; Chen X; Yu A; Xia L; Zhang P BMC Cancer; 2018 Nov; 18(1):1147. PubMed ID: 30463533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Survival and reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery performed for borderline epithelial ovarian tumor in Japanese adolescents and young adults: Results of a retrospective nationwide study. Kuji S; Harada M; Yoshioka N; Kajiyama H; Satoh T; Mikami M; Shozu M; Enomoto T; Osuga Y; Suzuki N J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Mar; 48(3):806-816. PubMed ID: 34951514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Could fertility-sparing surgery be considered for women with early stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma? Nasioudis D; Chapman-Davis E; Frey MK; Witkin SS; Holcomb K J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e71. PubMed ID: 28758377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The feasibility of fertility-sparing surgery in treating advanced-stage borderline ovarian tumors: A meta-analysis. Huang Y; Zhang W; Wang Y Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 55(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 27343308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Conservative treatment of early stage ovarian cancer: oncological and fertility outcomes. Zapardiel I; Diestro MD; Aletti G Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 40(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 24368049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Fertility-sparing surgery for young women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Nam JH; Park JY Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 76(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 23751891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer with dense adhesion: a long-term result from a single institution. Baek MH; Park JY; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 31(6):e85. PubMed ID: 33078594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fertility-sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer. Bentivegna E; Morice P; Uzan C; Gouy S Future Oncol; 2016 Feb; 12(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 26768952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Long-term survival of young women receiving fertility-sparing surgery for ovarian cancer in comparison with those undergoing radical surgery. Kajiyama H; Shibata K; Mizuno M; Umezu T; Suzuki S; Nawa A; Kawai M; Nagasaka T; Kikkawa F Br J Cancer; 2011 Oct; 105(9):1288-94. PubMed ID: 21970882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Staging procedures fail to benefit women with borderline ovarian tumours who want to preserve fertility: a retrospective analysis of 448 cases. Li N; Gou J; Li L; Ming X; Hu TW; Li Z BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):769. PubMed ID: 32807135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Primary debulking surgery vs. interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Chiofalo B; Bruni S; Certelli C; Sperduti I; Baiocco E; Vizza E Minerva Med; 2019 Aug; 110(4):330-340. PubMed ID: 31081304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Could uterine conservation be an option in presumed early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer? Benoit L; Pajot C; Koual M; Nguyen-Xuan HT; Bentivegna E; Bats AS; Azaïs H Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Sep; 308(3):953-960. PubMed ID: 37031304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Unilateral cystectomy and serous histology are associated with relapse in borderline ovarian tumor patients with fertility-sparing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Li N; Ming X; Li Z Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Nov; 302(5):1063-1074. PubMed ID: 32748055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Safety of fertility sparing management in invasive mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Kim SR; Madariaga A; Hogen L; Vicus D; Covens A; Parra-Herran C; Lheureux S; Gien LT Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():129-132. PubMed ID: 37182433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary: is it possible? Kajiyama H; Shibata K; Mizuno M; Hosono S; Kawai M; Nagasaka T; Kikkawa F Hum Reprod; 2011 Dec; 26(12):3297-302. PubMed ID: 22016417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Is standard radical surgery necessary for elderly patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma? ~Propensity score matched analysis~. Kajiyama H; Yoshihara M; Tamauchi S; Yoshikawa N; Niimi K; Suzuki S; Shibata K; Kikkawa F Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 50(4):411-418. PubMed ID: 31837651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A non-randomized confirmatory study regarding selection of fertility-sparing surgery for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG1203). Satoh T; Tsuda H; Kanato K; Nakamura K; Shibata T; Takano M; Baba T; Ishikawa M; Ushijima K; Yaegashi N; Yoshikawa H; Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jun; 45(6):595-9. PubMed ID: 26059697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]