These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32294109)

  • 1. Beware of vested interests: Epistemic vigilance improves reasoning about scientific evidence (for some people).
    Gierth L; Bromme R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231387. PubMed ID: 32294109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Getting to the source of the illusion of consensus.
    Connor Desai S; Xie B; Hayes BK
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():105023. PubMed ID: 35149359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children's vigilance towards deception.
    Mascaro O; Sperber D
    Cognition; 2009 Sep; 112(3):367-80. PubMed ID: 19540473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative - not absolute - judgments of credibility affect susceptibility to misinformation conveyed during discussion.
    French L; Garry M; Mori K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jan; 136(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 21112042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epistemic trust: modeling children's reasoning about others' knowledge and intent.
    Shafto P; Eaves B; Navarro DJ; Perfors A
    Dev Sci; 2012 May; 15(3):436-47. PubMed ID: 22490183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Source credibility and syllogistic reasoning.
    Copeland DE; Gunawan K; Bies-Hernandez NJ
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 21264611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. You don't act like you trust me: dissociations between behavioural and explicit measures of source credibility judgement.
    Gordon R; Spears K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 21824016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repetition, not number of sources, increases both susceptibility to misinformation and confidence in the accuracy of eyewitnesses.
    Foster JL; Huthwaite T; Yesberg JA; Garry M; Loftus EF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Feb; 139(2):320-6. PubMed ID: 22257711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Enthusiastic Language on the Credibility of Health Information and the Trustworthiness of Science Communicators: Insights From a Between-Subject Web-Based Experiment.
    König L; Jucks R
    Interact J Med Res; 2019 Aug; 8(3):e13619. PubMed ID: 31411138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Truthiness and falsiness of trivia claims depend on judgmental contexts.
    Newman EJ; Garry M; Unkelbach C; Bernstein DM; Lindsay DS; Nash RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1337-48. PubMed ID: 25822783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hot topics in science communication: Aggressive language decreases trustworthiness and credibility in scientific debates.
    König L; Jucks R
    Public Underst Sci; 2019 May; 28(4):401-416. PubMed ID: 30843467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The context and quality of evidence used by tobacco interests to oppose ANVISA's 2012 regulations in Brazil.
    Lencucha R; de Lima Pontes C
    Glob Public Health; 2018 Sep; 13(9):1204-1215. PubMed ID: 28884634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Training young children in strategic deception promotes epistemic vigilance.
    Ding XP; Lim HY; Heyman GD
    Dev Psychol; 2022 Jun; 58(6):1128-1138. PubMed ID: 35311317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reasonableness, Credibility, and Clinical Disagreement.
    Walker MJ; Rogers WA
    AMA J Ethics; 2017 Feb; 19(2):176-182. PubMed ID: 28225698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What Debunking of Misinformation Does and Doesn't.
    Jang JW; Lee EJ; Shin SY
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2019 Jun; 22(6):423-427. PubMed ID: 31135182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The source of the truth bias: Heuristic processing?
    Street CN; Masip J
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Jun; 56(3):254-63. PubMed ID: 25707774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Joanna Stephens and the Stone: credibility economy in the history of medicine.
    Walsh J
    Perspect Biol Med; 2023; 66(2):267-283. PubMed ID: 37755716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The independent effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on retraction believability: The moderating role of vested interest.
    Susmann MW; Wegener DT
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):845-861. PubMed ID: 36460863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Credibility judgments of narratives: language, plausibility, and absorption.
    Nahari G; Glicksohn J; Nachson I
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(3):319-35. PubMed ID: 20923085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.