These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32295193)

  • 1. Comparison of Methods for the Histological Evaluation of Odontocete Spiral Ganglion Cells.
    Ramírez T; Sacchini S; Paz Y; Rosales RS; Câmara N; Andrada M; Arbelo M; Fernández A
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 32295193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Decalcification Techniques for Rat Femurs Using HE and Immunohistochemical Staining.
    Liu H; Zhu R; Liu C; Ma R; Wang L; Chen B; Li L; Niu J; Zhao D; Mo F; Fu M; Brömme D; Zhang D; Gao S
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():9050754. PubMed ID: 28246608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Different Decalcification Methods Using Rat Mandibles as a Model.
    Savi FM; Brierly GI; Baldwin J; Theodoropoulos C; Woodruff MA
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2017 Dec; 65(12):705-722. PubMed ID: 28958188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions.
    Bogoevski K; Woloszyk A; Blackwood K; Woodruff MA; Glatt V
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2019 Aug; 67(8):545-561. PubMed ID: 31090479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation and comparison of decalcification agents on the human teeth.
    Sanjai K; Kumarswamy J; Patil A; Papaiah L; Jayaram S; Krishnan L
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2012 May; 16(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 22923894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of routine decalcification methods with microwave decalcification of bone and teeth.
    Sangeetha R; Uma K; Chandavarkar V
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2013 Sep; 17(3):386-91. PubMed ID: 24574657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of three decalcification agents for assessments of cranial fracture histomorphology.
    Cornelison JB; Isaac CV; Devota CJ; Billian J; Brown TT; deJong JL; Douglas EA; Fisher-Hubbard AO; Lackey-Cornelison WL; Prahlow JA; Shattuck BL
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1157-1166. PubMed ID: 35112350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RNA preservation in decalcified cochlear samples.
    Waissbluth S; Chan SW; Chen JZ; McIntosh M; Daniel SJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 23250382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of decalcifying agents and techniques for human dental tissues.
    Choube A; Astekar M; Choube A; Sapra G; Agarwal A; Rana A
    Biotech Histochem; 2018; 93(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 29313383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tooth decalcification: A correlation between weight loss in a decalcified tooth with different decalcifying agents.
    Khan MI; Khare A; Shamim Khan S; Mahendra A; Nasir A; Khan A
    J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(6):748-752. PubMed ID: 36118145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advantages of a combined method of decalcification compared to EDTA.
    Castania VA; Silveira JW; Issy AC; Pitol DL; Castania ML; Neto AD; Bel EA; Defino HL
    Microsc Res Tech; 2015 Feb; 78(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 25452153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The comparative analyses of decalcification procedures and methyl benzoate pre-treatment on tissue preservation and antigenicity in human acetabular labra.
    Pieroh P; Ehrlich A; Ghadban C; Litvak L; Steinke H; Josten C; Fakler JKM; Dehghani F
    Histol Histopathol; 2019 Aug; 34(8):899-908. PubMed ID: 30758043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tooth decalcification using different decalcifying agents - A comparative study.
    Khangura AK; Gupta S; Gulati A; Singh S
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2021; 25(3):463-469. PubMed ID: 35281150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between Conventional Decalcification and a Microwave-Assisted Method in Bone Tissue Affected with Mycetoma.
    Salih MM
    Biochem Res Int; 2020; 2020():6561980. PubMed ID: 32832156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative Histological Evaluation of Various Decalcifying Agents on Human Dental Tissue.
    Bumalee D; Lapthanasupkul P; Songkampol K; Srimaneekarn N; Kitkumthorn N; Arayapisit T
    Eur J Dent; 2023 Jul; 17(3):818-822. PubMed ID: 36220113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation.
    Nadol JB
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):220-8. PubMed ID: 9334769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of ultrasound accelerates the decalcification process of bone matrix without affecting histological and immunohistochemical analysis.
    Chow DH; Zheng L; Tian L; Ho KS; Qin L; Guo X
    J Orthop Translat; 2019 Apr; 17():112-120. PubMed ID: 31194084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Microwave Versus Conventional Decalcification of Teeth Using Three Different Decalcifying Solutions.
    Srinivasyaiah A; Nitin P; Hegde U
    J Lab Physicians; 2016; 8(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 27365920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of EDTA and nitric acid solutions for decalcification of joints in AG/WT, BALB/c, C57, DBA1/J mice, and in Wistar rats.
    Freitas EC; Dalmolin SP; da Silva MM; de Oliveira FH; Pilar EFS
    Biotech Histochem; 2022 Jul; 97(5):372-381. PubMed ID: 34845957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Different Decalcification Agents on Extracted Tooth: A Comparative Study.
    Umbare DKK; Patil R; Sabnis S; Yadav R; Satdive SB; Kandalkar SS
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2023 Jul; 15(Suppl 2):S1132-S1135. PubMed ID: 37694000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.