BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32295283)

  • 1. Dynamics, a Powerful Component of Current and Future in Silico Approaches for Protein Design and Engineering.
    Surpeta B; Sequeiros-Borja CE; Brezovsky J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Apr; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 32295283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent advances in user-friendly computational tools to engineer protein function.
    Sequeiros-Borja CE; Surpeta B; Brezovsky J
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32743637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational protein design with backbone plasticity.
    MacDonald JT; Freemont PS
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2016 Oct; 44(5):1523-1529. PubMed ID: 27911735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Progress in computational protein design.
    Lippow SM; Tidor B
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2007 Aug; 18(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 17644370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applications of Normal Mode Analysis Methods in Computational Protein Design.
    Frappier V; Chartier M; Najmanovich R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():203-214. PubMed ID: 27914052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computational tools for designing and engineering biocatalysts.
    Damborsky J; Brezovsky J
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2009 Feb; 13(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 19297237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multistate Computational Protein Design with Backbone Ensembles.
    Davey JA; Chica RA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():161-179. PubMed ID: 27914050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein design in biological networks: from manipulating the input to modifying the output.
    Van der Sloot AM; Kiel C; Serrano L; Stricher F
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Sep; 22(9):537-42. PubMed ID: 19574296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Protein engineering: from directed evolution to computational design].
    Qu G; Zhu T; Jiang Y; Wu B; Sun Z
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1843-1856. PubMed ID: 31668033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current Trends in Protein Engineering: Updates and Progress.
    Sinha R; Shukla P
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2019; 20(5):398-407. PubMed ID: 30451109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Brief History of De Novo Protein Design: Minimal, Rational, and Computational.
    Woolfson DN
    J Mol Biol; 2021 Oct; 433(20):167160. PubMed ID: 34298061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A critical analysis of computational protein design with sparse residue interaction graphs.
    Jain S; Jou JD; Georgiev IS; Donald BR
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Mar; 13(3):e1005346. PubMed ID: 28358804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning Strategies in Protein Directed Evolution.
    Cadet XF; Gelly JC; van Noord A; Cadet F; Acevedo-Rocha CG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2461():225-275. PubMed ID: 35727454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate prediction for atomic-level protein design and its application in diversifying the near-optimal sequence space.
    Fromer M; Yanover C
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):682-705. PubMed ID: 19003998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BBK* (Branch and Bound Over K*): A Provable and Efficient Ensemble-Based Protein Design Algorithm to Optimize Stability and Binding Affinity Over Large Sequence Spaces.
    Ojewole AA; Jou JD; Fowler VG; Donald BR
    J Comput Biol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):726-739. PubMed ID: 29641249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hotspot-centric de novo design of protein binders.
    Fleishman SJ; Corn JE; Strauch EM; Whitehead TA; Karanicolas J; Baker D
    J Mol Biol; 2011 Nov; 413(5):1047-62. PubMed ID: 21945116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Rosetta flexible-backbone computational protein design methods on binding interactions.
    Loshbaugh AL; Kortemme T
    Proteins; 2020 Jan; 88(1):206-226. PubMed ID: 31344278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational design gains momentum in enzyme catalysis engineering.
    Wijma HJ; Janssen DB
    FEBS J; 2013 Jul; 280(13):2948-60. PubMed ID: 23647554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel, provable algorithms for efficient ensemble-based computational protein design and their application to the redesign of the c-Raf-RBD:KRas protein-protein interface.
    Lowegard AU; Frenkel MS; Holt GT; Jou JD; Ojewole AA; Donald BR
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Jun; 16(6):e1007447. PubMed ID: 32511232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Achievements and Challenges in Computational Protein Design.
    Samish I
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():21-94. PubMed ID: 27914045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.