BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32296865)

  • 21. Soft Tissue Response and Survival of Extraoral Implants: A Long-Term Follow-up.
    Balik A; Ozdemir-Karatas M; Peker K; Cifter ED; Sancakli E; Gökcen-Röhlig B
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 25295726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prosthesis auricular with osseointegrated implants and quality of life.
    dos Santos DM; Goiato MC; Pesqueira AA; Bannwart LC; Rezende MC; Magro-Filho O; Moreno A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 20061968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Current state of craniofacial prosthetic rehabilitation.
    Ariani N; Visser A; van Oort RP; Kusdhany L; Rahardjo TB; Krom BP; van der Mei HC; Vissink A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 23342336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assisted retention of a hearing device in an implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
    Taft RM; von Gonten AS; Wheeler ST
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 86(4):386-9. PubMed ID: 11677533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computed tomography-based planning and three-dimensional modeling for craniofacial implant placement: a technical note.
    Kurtulmus H; Cotert HS; Guneri P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):943-6. PubMed ID: 19865636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Presurgical confirmation of craniofacial implant locations in children requiring implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
    Wang R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Apr; 81(4):492-5. PubMed ID: 10095223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
    Demir N; Malkoc MA; Ozturk AN; Tosun Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1795-7. PubMed ID: 21119423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A two-step functional impression technique for the fabrication of an implant-retained silicone auricular prosthesis.
    Waqas TS; Shrestha B; Srithavaj ML; Chotprasert N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):444-447. PubMed ID: 27677216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality of implant anchored craniofacial and intraoral prostheses: patient's evaluation.
    Smolarz-Wojnowska A; Raithel F; Gellrich NC; Klein C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):e202-7. PubMed ID: 24621771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vacuum-formed matrix as a guide for the fabrication of craniofacial implant tissue bar-retained auricular prostheses.
    Cheng AC; Morrison D; Cho RS; Archibald D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):711-4. PubMed ID: 9627903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Facial prosthetics: techniques used in the retention of prostheses following ablative cancer surgery or trauma and for congenital defects.
    Johnson F; Cannavina G; Brook I; Watson J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2000 Mar; 8(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 11307390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implant-retained auricular prostheses: a clinical challenge.
    Arora V; Sahoo NK; Gopi A; Saini DK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 45(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 26792146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of a surgical positioner for bone-anchored facial prostheses.
    Reisberg DJ; Habakuk SW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):376-9. PubMed ID: 9197103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Role of Auricular Prostheses (Epitheses) in Ear Reconstruction.
    Federspil PA
    Facial Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 31(6):626-32. PubMed ID: 26667638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Survival rates and periimplant soft tissue evaluation of extraoral implants over a mean follow-up period of three years.
    Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 19033030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in the UK: a survey of maxillofacial prosthetists' and technologists' attitudes and opinions.
    Hatamleh MM; Haylock C; Watson J; Watts DC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 39(12):1186-92. PubMed ID: 20832245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation using extraoral implants.
    Leonardi A; Buonaccorsi S; Pellacchia V; Moricca LM; Indrizzi E; Fini G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):398-405. PubMed ID: 18362717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Retention systems to implant-supported craniofacial prostheses.
    Goiato MC; Delben JA; Monteiro DR; dos Santos DM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):889-91. PubMed ID: 19349908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fully digital workflow for ear defect rehabilitation with an immediate implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
    Wei H; Bi Y; Li M; Bai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1259-1263. PubMed ID: 35610085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patient-Specific Implant in Prosthetic Craniofacial Reconstruction: First Report of a Novel Technique With Far-Reaching Perspective.
    Toso SM; Menzel K; Motzkus Y; Adolphs N; Hoffmeister B; Raguse JD
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2133-5. PubMed ID: 26468797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.