115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32297136)
1. Prognostic value of pretreatment tumor-to-blood standardized uptake ratio (SUR) in rectal cancer.
Belge G; Bilgin C; Ozkaya G; Kandemirli SG; Alper E
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Jun; 34(6):432-440. PubMed ID: 32297136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Hofheinz F; Li Y; Steffen IG; Lin Q; Lili C; Hua W; van den Hoff J; Zschaeck S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 30949816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents.
Hwang SH; Cho A; Yun M; Choi YD; Rha SY; Kang WJ
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):e235-e241. PubMed ID: 28288043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value and metabolic tumour volume on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Kim JW; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(9):1353-61. PubMed ID: 26067088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT metabolic parameters in patients with advanced extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma].
Wu LL; Liang JH; Wang L; Xu W; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 41(11):831-836. PubMed ID: 31770850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic Value of Pretherapeutic Tumor-to-Blood Standardized Uptake Ratio in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma.
Bütof R; Hofheinz F; Zöphel K; Stadelmann T; Schmollack J; Jentsch C; Löck S; Kotzerke J; Baumann M; van den Hoff J
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1150-6. PubMed ID: 26089549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic Value of Metabolic and Volumetric Parameters of Preoperative FDG-PET/CT in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.
Im HJ; Oo S; Jung W; Jang JY; Kim SW; Cheon GJ; Kang KW; Chung JK; Kim EE; Lee DS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(19):e3686. PubMed ID: 27175707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT for patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].
Ding CY; Guo Z; Sun J; Yang WP; Li TR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 40(7):528-533. PubMed ID: 30060362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of
Lee JR; Almuhaimid TM; Roh JL; Oh JS; Kim SJ; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 118(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 30132891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic role of baseline
Albano D; Bosio G; Camoni L; Farina M; Re A; Tucci A; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
Hematol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30299563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of distant metastasis and survival in adenoid cystic carcinoma using quantitative
Lim WS; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Kim SJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Oral Oncol; 2018 Feb; 77():98-104. PubMed ID: 29362133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does baseline [18F] FDG-PET/CT correlate with tumor staging, response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and prognosis in patients with rectal cancer?
Deantonio L; Caroli A; Puta E; Ferrante D; Apicella F; Turri L; Sacchetti G; Brambilla M; Krengli M
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Oct; 13(1):211. PubMed ID: 30359275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recurrent bladder carcinoma: clinical and prognostic role of 18 F-FDG PET/CT.
Alongi P; Caobelli F; Gentile R; Stefano A; Russo G; Albano D; Baldari S; Gilardi MC; Midiri M
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Feb; 44(2):224-233. PubMed ID: 27565154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic value of
Hotta M; Minamimoto R; Gohda Y; Miwa K; Otani K; Kiyomatsu T; Yano H
Ann Nucl Med; 2021 Jul; 35(7):843-852. PubMed ID: 33948903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pretreatment quantitative
Gencturk M; Ozturk K; Koksel Y; Li F; Cayci Z
Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():17-24. PubMed ID: 30308429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value on F18-FDG PET/CT in patients with extranodal nasal type NK/T cell lymphoma: A multicenter, retrospective analysis.
Pak K; Kim BS; Kim K; Kim IJ; Jun S; Jeong YJ; Shim HK; Kim SD; Cho KS
Am J Otolaryngol; 2018; 39(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 29056243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Parameters of Metastatic Lymph Nodes on
Jin F; Qu B; Fu Z; Zhang Y; Han A; Kong L; Yu J
Clin Lung Cancer; 2018 Jan; 19(1):e101-e108. PubMed ID: 28690012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by
Chang H; Lee SJ; Lim J; Lee JS; Kim YJ; Lee WW
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 May; 145(5):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 30900157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Quantitative
Pinho DF; King B; Xi Y; Albuquerque K; Lea J; Subramaniam RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):908-916. PubMed ID: 32069078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
