These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Szasz on psychiatric justice. West DJ Br J Psychiatry; 1989 Jun; 154():870-1. PubMed ID: 2597896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Consultation of the medical expert in dispensation of safety detention (paragraphs 80 a, 246 a Criminal Code)]. Kaatsch HJ Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1984; 42():5-8. PubMed ID: 6477451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who needs capacity? Buchanan A Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 40():1-5. PubMed ID: 25939285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Supreme Court and the mentally disabled criminal defendant: recent developments. Perlin ML Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(4):391-409. PubMed ID: 3427241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law. Gutheil TG; Mills MJ Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Forensic psychiatry: critique of a critique. Zonana HV Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 6478066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The insanity defense: a difficult necessity. McGrath JJ Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jan; 36(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 3967874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of psychiatry in the sentencing process. Dershowitz A Int J Law Psychiatry; 1978 Feb; 1(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 750521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill. Neff RC Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The individualizing function of forensic multidisciplinary assessment in a Dutch residential setting: the Pieter Baan Centre experience. Koenraadt F Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 1587654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Expert testimony in sexually violent predator commitments: conceptualizing legal standards of "mental disorder" and "likely to reoffend". Sreenivasan S; Weinberger LE; Garrick T J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):471-85. PubMed ID: 14974803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dawn of a "new legalism" in Australia? The New South Wales Mental Health Act, 1983 and related legislation. Verdun-Jones SN Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 8(1):95-118. PubMed ID: 3940168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "The whole truth" versus "the admissible truth": an ethics dilemma for expert witnesses. Gutheil TG; Hauser M; White MS; Spruiell G; Strasburger LH J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 14974796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Compulsory commitment of psychiatric patients from the viewpoint of physicians and judges--exemplified by the use of the psychiatric law of North Rhine and Westphalia]. Bergener M; Blöink M; Christiansen U; Husser J; Neller K; Theisohn I; Draber A; Radermacher P; Weber E; Wiebe A Psychiatr Prax; 1986 May; 13(3):104-11. PubMed ID: 3737781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guilty but mentally ill: a retreat from the insanity defense. Sherman SL Am J Law Med; 1981; 7(2):237-64. PubMed ID: 7304614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The insanity defense, the mentally disturbed offender, and sentencing discretion. Litwack TR Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1980; 347():185-98. PubMed ID: 6930898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Justifications for the insanity defence in Great Britain and the United States: the conflicting rationales of morality and compassion. Gostin LO Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(2):100-15. PubMed ID: 7317652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]