These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32297766)

  • 1. The power shield: Powerful roles eliminate gender disparities in political elections.
    Pike BE; Galinsky AD
    J Appl Psychol; 2021 Feb; 106(2):268-280. PubMed ID: 32297766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
    Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rethinking stereotype reliance. Understanding the connection between female candidates and gender stereotypes.
    Bauer NM
    Politics Life Sci; 2013; 32(1):22-42. PubMed ID: 24047089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Not just a man's world: women's political leadership in the American labor movement.
    Martin AW
    Soc Sci Res; 2014 Jul; 46():23-37. PubMed ID: 24767587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Gender Distribution in Medical Leadership Roles in Portugal: The Example of Candidacy to Bodies of the Portuguese Medical Association 2017-2019].
    Cabral M; Paixão M; Leite A
    Acta Med Port; 2021 May; 34(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 33296621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Men and women candidates are similarly persistent after losing elections.
    Bernhard R; de Benedictis-Kessner J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(26):. PubMed ID: 34155107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pragmatic bias impedes women's access to political leadership.
    Corbett C; Voelkel JG; Cooper M; Willer R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Feb; 119(6):. PubMed ID: 35105805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is support of abortion political suicide?
    Rosoff JI
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1975; 7(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 1112380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing gender bias in the evaluation and selection of future leaders: The role of decision-makers' mindsets about the universality of leadership potential.
    Liu Z; Rattan A; Savani K
    J Appl Psychol; 2023 Dec; 108(12):1924-1951. PubMed ID: 37523297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit Gender Bias in Linguistic Descriptions for Expected Events: The Cases of the 2016 United States and 2017 United Kingdom Elections.
    von der Malsburg T; Poppels T; Levy RP
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Feb; 31(2):115-128. PubMed ID: 31913768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breaking the glass ceiling: For one and all?
    Manzi F; Heilman ME
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Feb; 120(2):257-277. PubMed ID: 33252976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Political Ideology Modifies the Effect of Glass Cliff Candidacies on Election Outcomes for Women in American State Legislative Races (2011-2016).
    Robinson SL; Kulich C; Aelenei C; Iacoviello V
    Psychol Women Q; 2021 Jun; 45(2):155-177. PubMed ID: 34040281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexism in obstetrics and gynecology: not just a "women's issue".
    Hughes F; Bernstein PS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 219(4):364.e1-364.e4. PubMed ID: 30017680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Closest to the People? Incumbency Advantage and the Personal Vote in Non-Partisan Elections.
    Lucas J; McGregor RM; Tuxhorn KL
    Polit Res Q; 2022 Mar; 75(1):188-202. PubMed ID: 35185309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration.
    Ceci SJ; Kahn S; Williams WM
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2023 Jul; 24(1):15-73. PubMed ID: 37098793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of facial morphology of UK and US general election candidates: Does the 'power face' exist?
    Islam S; Taylor CJ; Hayter JP
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Jul; 70(7):931-936. PubMed ID: 28456534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mortality Salience, System Justification, and Candidate Evaluations in the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Sterling J; Jost JT; Shrout PE
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150556. PubMed ID: 26982197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender equality eliminates gender gaps in engagement with female-stereotypic domains.
    Moss-Racusin CA; Rapp SA; Brown SS; O'Brien KA; Croft A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2024 Mar; 30(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 36548086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Personalism or party platform? Gender quotas and women's representation under different electoral system orientations.
    Forman-Rabinovici A; Nir L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257665. PubMed ID: 34555093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.