173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32298322)
1. Validation of the Polar OH1 and M600 optical heart rate sensors during front crawl swim training.
Olstad BH; Zinner C
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231522. PubMed ID: 32298322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of Polar OH1 optical heart rate sensor for moderate and high intensity physical activities.
Hettiarachchi IT; Hanoun S; Nahavandi D; Nahavandi S
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0217288. PubMed ID: 31120968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of Heart Rate Using the Polar OH1 and Fitbit Charge 3 Wearable Devices in Healthy Adults During Light, Moderate, Vigorous, and Sprint-Based Exercise: Validation Study.
Muggeridge DJ; Hickson K; Davies AV; Giggins OM; Megson IL; Gorely T; Crabtree DR
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Mar; 9(3):e25313. PubMed ID: 33764310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of Using an Armband Optical Heart Rate Sensor in Naturalistic Environment.
Yu H; Kotlyar M; Dufresne S; Thuras P; Pakhomov S
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2023; 28():43-54. PubMed ID: 36540963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of a Photoplethysmographic Heart Rate Monitor: Polar OH1.
Hermand E; Cassirame J; Ennequin G; Hue O
Int J Sports Med; 2019 Jul; 40(7):462-467. PubMed ID: 31189190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Polar M600 Optical Heart Rate and ECG Heart Rate during Exercise.
Horton JF; Stergiou P; Fung TS; Katz L
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Dec; 49(12):2600-2607. PubMed ID: 29135785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using Smart Bracelets to Assess Heart Rate Among Students During Physical Education Lessons: Feasibility, Reliability, and Validity Study.
Sun J; Liu Y
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Aug; 8(8):e17699. PubMed ID: 32663136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Heart Rate Measures From Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in a Laboratory and Free-Living Setting: Validation Study.
Müller AM; Wang NX; Yao J; Tan CS; Low ICC; Lim N; Tan J; Tan A; Müller-Riemenschneider F
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct; 7(10):e14120. PubMed ID: 31579026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring Heart Rate Accurately in Patients With Parkinson Disease During Intense Exercise: Usability Study of Fitbit Charge 4.
Colonna G; Hoye J; de Laat B; Stanley G; Ibrahimy A; Tinaz S; Morris ED
JMIR Biomed Eng; 2023 Dec; 8():e51515. PubMed ID: 38875680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and Precision of Wearable Devices for Real-Time Monitoring of Swimming Athletes.
Cosoli G; Antognoli L; Veroli V; Scalise L
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Polar
Schubert MM; Clark A; De La Rosa AB
Sports Med Int Open; 2018 Jun; 2(3):E67-E70. PubMed ID: 30539120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of Wrist-Worn Photoplethysmography Devices at Measuring Heart Rate in the Laboratory and During Free-Living Activities.
Giggins OM; Doyle J; Sojan N; Moran O; Crabtree DR; Fraser M; Muggeridge DJ
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():6970-6973. PubMed ID: 34892707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wrist-worn devices for the measurement of heart rate and energy expenditure: A validation study for the Apple Watch 6, Polar Vantage V and Fitbit Sense.
Hajj-Boutros G; Landry-Duval MA; Comtois AS; Gouspillou G; Karelis AD
Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Feb; 23(2):165-177. PubMed ID: 34957939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of the Polar Vantage M watch when measuring heart rate at different exercise intensities.
Shumate T; Link M; Furness J; Kemp-Smith K; Simas V; Climstein M
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10893. PubMed ID: 33614295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Heart Rate Monitoring Among Breast Cancer Survivors: Quantitative Study of Device Agreement in a Community-Based Exercise Program.
Page LL; Fanning J; Phipps C; Berger A; Reed E; Ehlers D
JMIR Cancer; 2024 Jun; 10():e51210. PubMed ID: 38900505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Heart rate processing algorithms and exercise duration on reliability and validity decisions in biceps-worn Polar Verity Sense and OH1 wearables.
Navalta JW; Davis DW; Malek EM; Carrier B; Bodell NG; Manning JW; Cowley J; Funk M; Lawrence MM; DeBeliso M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):11736. PubMed ID: 37474743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stressing the accuracy: Wrist-worn wearable sensor validation over different conditions.
Menghini L; Gianfranchi E; Cellini N; Patron E; Tagliabue M; Sarlo M
Psychophysiology; 2019 Nov; 56(11):e13441. PubMed ID: 31332802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study.
Nelson BW; Allen NB
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e10828. PubMed ID: 30855232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement latency significantly contributes to reduced heart rate measurement accuracy in wearable devices.
Støve MP; Holm RS; Kjaersgaard AS; Duncker K; Jensen MR; Larsen BT
J Med Eng Technol; 2020 Apr; 44(3):125-132. PubMed ID: 32404012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inertial Sensors in Swimming: Detection of Stroke Phases through 3D Wrist Trajectory.
Cortesi M; Giovanardi A; Gatta G; Mangia AL; Bartolomei S; Fantozzi S
J Sports Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 18(3):438-447. PubMed ID: 31427865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
