These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32299728)

  • 1. The future of electronic fetal monitoring.
    Knupp RJ; Andrews WW; Tita ATN
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Aug; 67():44-52. PubMed ID: 32299728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation in labour: a critical appraisal.
    Maso G; Piccoli M; De Seta F; Parolin S; Banco R; Camacho Mattos L; Bogatti P; Alberico S
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Feb; 67(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 25411863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management.
    Pinas A; Chandraharan E
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():33-47. PubMed ID: 26165747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring: the fetal reserve index.
    Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM; Devoe LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5S):S1129-S1143. PubMed ID: 37164491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Cahill AG; Spain J
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 58(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 25811127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
    Devane D; Lalor J; Bonnar J
    Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Vintzileos AM; Nochimson DJ; Guzman ER; Knuppel RA; Lake M; Schifrin BS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 7800313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms and ST signals is associated with significant reductions in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and cesarean delivery: an observational study in 38,466 deliveries.
    Lopes-Pereira J; Costa A; Ayres-De-Campos D; Costa-Santos C; Amaral J; Bernardes J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):269.e1-269.e8. PubMed ID: 30594567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes.
    Timonen S; Holmberg K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):620.e1-620.e7. PubMed ID: 29577914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fetal Heart Rate Auscultation, 3rd edition.
    Wisner K; Holschuh C
    Nurs Womens Health; 2018 Dec; 22(6):e1-e32. PubMed ID: 30501909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic fetal monitoring: past, present, and future.
    Stout MJ; Cahill AG
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):127-42, vii. PubMed ID: 21353094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiotocography alone vs. cardiotocography with ST segment analysis for intrapartum fetal monitoring in women with late-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial.
    Puertas A; Góngora J; Valverde M; Revelles L; Manzanares S; Carrillo MP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Mar; 234():213-217. PubMed ID: 30731334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ST analysis of fetal electrocardiography in labor.
    Amer-Wåhlin I; Maršál K
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Feb; 16(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 21115414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changing Perspectives of Electronic Fetal Monitoring.
    Evans MI; Britt DW; Evans SM; Devoe LD
    Reprod Sci; 2022 Jun; 29(6):1874-1894. PubMed ID: 34664218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deceleration area of fetal heart rate trace and fetal acidemia at delivery: a case-control study.
    Giannubilo SR; Buscicchio G; Gentilucci L; Palla GP; Tranquilli AL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Feb; 20(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 17437212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor.
    Thacker SB; Stroup DF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000063. PubMed ID: 10796109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. IMproving the practice of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate MOnitoring with cardiotocography for safer childbirth (the IMMO programme): protocol for a qualitative study.
    Lamé G; Liberati E; Burt J; Draycott T; Winter C; Ward J; Dixon-Woods M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e030271. PubMed ID: 31256041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: where are we now?
    Chez BF; Baird SM
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2011; 25(2):180-92; quiz 193-4. PubMed ID: 21540697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.