These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32300671)

  • 1. Determining a Bayesian predictive power stopping rule for futility in a non-inferiority trial with binary outcomes.
    Heath A; Offringa M; Pechlivanoglou P; Rios JD; Klassen TP; Poonai N; Pullenayegum E;
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2020 Jun; 18():100561. PubMed ID: 32300671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When inferiority meets non-inferiority: implications for interim analyses.
    Bratton DJ; Williams HC; Kahan BC; Phillips PP; Nunn AJ
    Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 22796636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The intranasal dexmedetomidine plus ketamine for procedural sedation in children, adaptive randomized controlled non-inferiority multicenter trial (Ketodex): a statistical analysis plan.
    Heath A; Rios JD; Pullenayegum E; Pechlivanoglou P; Offringa M; Yaskina M; Watts R; Rimmer S; Klassen TP; Coriolano K; Poonai N;
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 33407719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Futility interim monitoring with control of type I and II error probabilities using the interim Z-value or confidence limit.
    Lachin JM
    Clin Trials; 2009 Dec; 6(6):565-73. PubMed ID: 19933716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do we need to adjust for interim analyses in a Bayesian adaptive trial design?
    Ryan EG; Brock K; Gates S; Slade D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):150. PubMed ID: 32522284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A flexible futility monitoring method with time-varying conditional power boundary.
    Ying Zhang ; Clarke WR
    Clin Trials; 2010 Jun; 7(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 20423927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic survey of randomised trials that stopped early for reasons of futility.
    Walter SD; Han H; Guyatt GH; Bassler D; Bhatnagar N; Gloy V; Schandelmaier S; Briel M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 31948397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interim monitoring for non-inferiority trials: minimizing patient exposure to inferior therapies.
    Korn EL; Freidlin B
    Ann Oncol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):573-577. PubMed ID: 29267937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a multi-arm multi-stage Bayesian design for phase II drug selection trials - an example in hemato-oncology.
    Jacob L; Uvarova M; Boulet S; Begaj I; Chevret S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():67. PubMed ID: 27250349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of futility monitoring guidelines using completed phase III oncology trials.
    Zhang Q; Freidlin B; Korn EL; Halabi S; Mandrekar S; Dignam JJ
    Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 14(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 27590208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian response-adaptive dose-finding and comparative effectiveness trial.
    Heath A; Yaskina M; Pechlivanoglou P; Rios D; Offringa M; Klassen TP; Poonai N; Pullenayegum E
    Clin Trials; 2021 Feb; 18(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 33231105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Over-accrual in Bayesian adaptive trials with continuous futility stopping.
    Barrado LG; Burzykowski T
    Clin Trials; 2023 Jun; 20(3):252-260. PubMed ID: 36803007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of Bayesian predictive probability for interim futility analysis in single-arm phase II trial.
    Chen DT; Schell MJ; Fulp WJ; Pettersson F; Kim S; Gray JE; Haura EB
    Transl Cancer Res; 2019 Jul; 8(Suppl 4):S404-S420. PubMed ID: 31456910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
    Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian Sequential Monitoring of Single-Arm Trials: A Comparison of Futility Rules Based on Binary Data.
    Sambucini V
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying the bias in the estimated treatment effect in randomized trials having interim analyses and a rule for early stopping for futility.
    Walter SD; Han H; Briel M; Guyatt GH
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(9):1506-1518. PubMed ID: 28183155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian hierarchical monitoring design for phase II cancer clinical trials: Incorporating information on response duration into monitoring rules.
    Wang J; Ma J; Cai C; Daver N; Ning J
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(21):4629-4639. PubMed ID: 34101217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian decision sequential analysis with survival endpoint in phase II clinical trials.
    Zhao L; Woodworth G
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1339-52. PubMed ID: 19226557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Bayesian vs Frequentist Adaptive Trial Design in the Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort Trial.
    Broglio K; Meurer WJ; Durkalski V; Pauls Q; Connor J; Berry D; Lewis RJ; Johnston KC; Barsan WG
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 May; 5(5):e2211616. PubMed ID: 35544137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Bayesian sequential design with binary outcome.
    Zhu H; Yu Q; Mercante DE
    Pharm Stat; 2017 May; 16(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 28251815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.