BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32300836)

  • 1. Doctor, a patient is on the phone asking about the endorectal coil!
    Muglia VF; Vargas HA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4003-4011. PubMed ID: 32300836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of an endorectal coil for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate at 3.0T in comparison to 1.5T: Do we need an endorectal coil?
    Hoffner MK; Huebner F; Scholtz JE; Zangos S; Schulz B; Luboldt W; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1432-8. PubMed ID: 27423684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Novel Three-Channel Endorectal Coil for Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3T.
    Mo Z; Zhang X; Liang H; Chen Q; Tie C; Xiao W; Cao Q; Liu C; Zou C; Wan L; Zhang X; Li Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Dec; 70(12):3381-3388. PubMed ID: 37318962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality Comparison of 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI of the prostate using a flexible surface receiver coil versus conventional surface coil plus endorectal coil setup.
    Ullrich T; Kohli MD; Ohliger MA; Magudia K; Arora SS; Barrett T; Bittencourt LK; Margolis DJ; Schimmöller L; Turkbey B; Westphalen AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4260-4270. PubMed ID: 32696213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multitransmit external body array combined with a
    Philips BWJ; van Uden MJ; Rietsch SHG; Orzada S; Scheenen TWJ
    Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3893-3905. PubMed ID: 31274201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and evaluation of a multichannel endorectal RF coil for prostate MRI at 7T in combination with an external surface array.
    Ertürk MA; Tian J; Van de Moortele PF; Adriany G; Metzger GJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1279-87. PubMed ID: 26584144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prostate MRI using an external phased array wearable pelvic coil at 3T: comparison with an endorectal coil.
    O'Donohoe RL; Dunne RM; Kimbrell V; Tempany CM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):1062-1069. PubMed ID: 30324501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.
    Mazaheri Y; Vargas HA; Nyman G; Shukla-Dave A; Akin O; Hricak H
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e515-20. PubMed ID: 23810189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Head-to-head comparison of prostate MRI using an endorectal coil versus a non-endorectal coil: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance in staging T3 prostate cancer.
    Tirumani SH; Suh CH; Kim KW; Shinagare AB; Ramaiya NH; Fennessy FM
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e9-157.e19. PubMed ID: 31711637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monte Carlo-based noise compensation in coil intensity corrected endorectal MRI.
    Lui D; Modhafar A; Haider MA; Wong A
    BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Oct; 15():43. PubMed ID: 26459631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical comparison between a currently available single-loop and an investigational dual-channel endorectal receive coil for prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Vos EK; Sambandamurthy S; Kamel M; McKenney R; van Uden MJ; Hoeks CM; Yakar D; Scheenen TW; Fütterer JJ
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 24019020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of prostate cancer detection at 3-T MRI with and without an endorectal coil: A prospective, paired-patient study.
    Costa DN; Yuan Q; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Lenkinski RE; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Francis F; Travalini D; Pedrosa I
    Urol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):255.e7-255.e13. PubMed ID: 26971190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
    Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel deep learning-based noise reduction technique for prostate magnetic resonance imaging.
    Wang X; Ma J; Bhosale P; Ibarra Rovira JJ; Qayyum A; Sun J; Bayram E; Szklaruk J
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jul; 46(7):3378-3386. PubMed ID: 33580348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expandable and rigid endorectal coils for prostate MRI: impact on prostate distortion and rigid image registration.
    Kim Y; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Noworolski SM; Vigneron DB; Kurhanewicz J
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3569-78. PubMed ID: 16475755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI of the Prostate With and Without Endorectal Coil at 3 T: Correlation With Whole-Mount Histopathologic Gleason Score.
    Dhatt R; Choy S; Co SJ; Ischia J; Kozlowski P; Harris AC; Jones EC; Black PC; Goldenberg SL; Chang SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 32160050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: comparison of 11C-choline PET/CT with pelvic multiparametric MR imaging with endorectal coil.
    Kitajima K; Murphy RC; Nathan MA; Froemming AT; Hagen CE; Takahashi N; Kawashima A
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 24434294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging].
    Beyersdorff D; Darsow U; Stephan C; Schnorr D; Loening S; Taupitz M
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 12811693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Staging and tissue characterization of prostate carcinoma: role of endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopy].
    Sugimura K
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2000 Nov; 46(11):855-9. PubMed ID: 11193312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.