These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3230087)

  • 21. Methods for detection of irradiation of spices.
    Sjöberg AM; Manninen M; Härmälä P; Pinnioja S
    Z Lebensm Unters Forsch; 1990 Feb; 190(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 2309522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rapid and automated enumeration of viable bacteria in compost using a micro-colony auto counting system.
    Wang X; Yamaguchi N; Someya T; Nasu M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Oct; 71(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17669529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of the Direct Epifluorescent Filter Technique for predicting the keeping quality of pasteurized milk within 24 hours.
    Rodrigues UM; Pettipher GL
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1984 Aug; 57(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 6548470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved direct epifluorescent filter technique for rapid bioburden control in intravenous solutions.
    Esteban JM; Diaz ML; Soriano F; Marin E
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1992; 46(5):146-9. PubMed ID: 1432451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rapid and automated detection of fluorescent total bacteria in water samples.
    Lepeuple AS; Gilouppe S; Pierlot E; De Roubin MR
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 May; 92(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15145591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing with three types of sponge or gauze.
    Martínez B; Celda MF; Anastasio B; García I; López-Mendoza MC
    J Food Prot; 2010 Jan; 73(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20051208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of two methods for monitoring surface cleanliness-ATP bioluminescence and traditional hygiene swabbing.
    Davidson CA; Griffith CJ; Peters AC; Fielding LM
    Luminescence; 1999; 14(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10398558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Hygienic and bacteriological comparative studies in 50 hospitals. V. Bacterial contamination of hospital surfaces (author's transl)].
    Pfeiffer EH; Wittig JR; Dunkelberg H; Werner HP
    Zentralbl Bakteriol B; 1978 Aug; 167(1-2):11-21. PubMed ID: 716697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.
    Byrne B; Dunne G; Lyng J; Bolton DJ
    Res Microbiol; 2005; 156(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 15636754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of bacterial superficial contamination in classical or ritually slaughtered cattle using metagenetics and microbiological analysis.
    Korsak N; Taminiau B; Hupperts C; Delhalle L; Nezer C; Delcenserie V; Daube G
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Apr; 247():79-86. PubMed ID: 27756497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of the Hygicult E dipslides method in surface hygiene control: a Nordic collaborative study.
    Salo S; Alanko T; Sjöberg AM; Wirtanen G
    J AOAC Int; 2002; 85(2):388-94. PubMed ID: 11990024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modern microbiological methods for foods: colony count and direct count methods. A review.
    García-Armesto MR; Prieto M; García-López ML; Otero A; Moreno B
    Microbiologia; 1993 Apr; 9(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8397961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of the microbiological methods hygicult dipslide, contact plate, and swabbing in surface hygiene control: a Nordic collaborative study.
    Salo S; Laine A; Alanko T; Sjöberg AM; Wirtanen G
    J AOAC Int; 2000; 83(6):1357-65. PubMed ID: 11128138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Applicability of solid-phase cytometry and epifluorescence microscopy for rapid assessment of the microbiological quality of dialysis water.
    Riepl M; Schauer S; Knetsch S; Holzhammer E; Farnleitner AH; Sommer R; Kirschner AK
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2011 Nov; 26(11):3640-5. PubMed ID: 21948860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of two non-invasive methods of microbial analysis in surgery practice: incision swabbing and the indirect imprint technique.
    Chovanec Z; Veverkova L; Votava M; Svoboda J; Jedlicka V; Capov I
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Dec; 15(6):786-93. PubMed ID: 25478933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of microbial contaminations in commercial frozen duck meats and the application of electron beam irradiation to improve their hygienic quality.
    An KA; Jo Y; Akram K; Suh SC; Kwon JH
    J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Nov; 98(14):5444-5449. PubMed ID: 29675926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. National monitoring study on microbial contamination of food-contact surfaces in hospital kitchens in Poland.
    Konecka-Matyjek E; Maćkiw E; Krygier B; Tomczuk K; Stoś K; Jarosz M
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2012; 19(3):457-63. PubMed ID: 23020039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Controlling microbial contamination on beef and lamb meat during processing.
    Widders PR; Coates KJ; Warner S; Beattie JC; Morgan IR; Hickey MW
    Aust Vet J; 1995 Jun; 72(6):208-11. PubMed ID: 8526812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.