These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32300933)

  • 21. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes.
    Sato H; Abe H; Ikeda A; Miyagawa T; Sato K; Tsukada S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 33890540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy posthysterectomy: intraoperative feasibility and safety in obese women compared with women of normal weight.
    Mahoney C; Scott G; Dwyer L; Reid F; Ward K; Smith A; Kearney R
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2041-2048. PubMed ID: 30810783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy.
    Jong K; Klein T; Zimmern PE
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):455-460. PubMed ID: 28980173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study.
    Illiano E; Ditonno P; Giannitsas K; De Rienzo G; Bini V; Costantini E
    Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():116-123. PubMed ID: 31563536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reoperation After Robotic and Vaginal Mesh Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Martin LA; Calixte R; Finamore PS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):315-8. PubMed ID: 26506158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: does mesh weight matter?
    Giugale LE; Hansbarger MM; Askew AL; Visco AG; Shepherd JP; Bradley MS
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2195-2201. PubMed ID: 33635349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mesh complications after total vs supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy at time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Das D; Carroll A; Mueller M; Kenton K; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Collins S; Geynisman-Tan J; Bretschneider CE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Sep; 33(9):2507-2514. PubMed ID: 35666287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Glue mesh fixation: Feasibility, tolerance and complication assessment. Results 24months after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Panel P; Soffray F; Roussillon E; Devins C; Brouziyne M; Abramowicz S
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 46(4):333-338. PubMed ID: 28643660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic mesh-supported pectopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: expanding the options of pelvic floor repair.
    Bolovis D; Hitzl W; Brucker C
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):815-823. PubMed ID: 34498174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Obesity and its long-term impact on sacrocolpopexy key outcomes (OBELISK).
    Smazinka M; Kalis V; Havir M; Havelkova L; Ismail KM; Rusavy Z
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Aug; 31(8):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31396638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Short-term Outcomes of Non-robotic Single-incision Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Surgical Technique.
    Liu J; Kohn J; Wu C; Guan Z; Guan X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):721-727. PubMed ID: 31146027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Ethiopian Women: What Is the Preferred Approach?
    Kenne K; Abreha M; Hart KD; Gregory WT; Nardos R
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 26(2):e7-e12. PubMed ID: 31990807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse After Hysterectomy: Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy.
    Lee W; Tam J; Kobashi K
    Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 30466696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.
    Mueller ER; Kenton K; Anger JT; Bresee C; Tarnay C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):917-21. PubMed ID: 27180224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. One-Year Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Kenton K; Mueller ER; Tarney C; Bresee C; Anger JT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(5):382-4. PubMed ID: 27403758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trends in Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair From the Medicare Database.
    Wang LC; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Hu JC; Laudano MA; Davison WL; Schulster ML; Zhao F; Chughtai B; Lee RK
    Urology; 2015 Nov; 86(5):885-91. PubMed ID: 26344153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hudson CO; Northington GM; Lyles RH; Karp DR
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 25181374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally invasive surgery in urogynecology: a comparison of standard laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, percutaneous surgical system, and robotic sacral colpopexy.
    Panico G; Campagna G; Vacca L; Caramazza D; Iannone V; Rossitto C; Rumolo V; Scambia G; Ercoli A
    Minerva Med; 2021 Aug; 112(4):483-491. PubMed ID: 32272829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh for severe pelvic organ prolapse.
    Zhu L; Sun Z; Yu M; Li B; Li X; Lang J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 May; 121(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 23415023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of obesity on operative complications and outcome after sacrocolpopexy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wen Q; Zhao Z; Wen J; Yang Y; Wang L; Wu J; Miao Y
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():309-316. PubMed ID: 33498005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.