These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32302648)

  • 1. Reduced Nogo-P3 in adults with developmental coordination disorder (DCD).
    Suzuki K; Kita Y; Shirakawa Y; Egashira Y; Mitsuhashi S; Kitamura Y; Okuzumi H; Kaga Y; Inagaki M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jul; 153():37-44. PubMed ID: 32302648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sedentary time is related to deficits in response inhibition among adults with overweight and obesity: An accelerometry and event-related brain potentials study.
    Pindus DM; Edwards CG; Walk AM; Reeser G; Burd NA; Holscher HD; Khan NA
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Aug; 58(8):e13843. PubMed ID: 34021599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disentangling specific inhibitory versus general decision-making processes during sleep deprivation using a Go/NoGo ERP paradigm.
    Gosselin A; De Koninck J; Campbell KB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jul; 141():18-27. PubMed ID: 31022412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of age on N2 and P3 components: A meta-analysis of Go/Nogo tasks.
    Cheng CH; Tsai HY; Cheng HN
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103574. PubMed ID: 31200173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A combined forced-attention dichotic listening - Go/Nogo task to assess response inhibition and interference suppression: An auditory event-related potential investigation.
    Bedoin N; Abadie R; Krzonowski J; Ferragne E; Marcastel A
    Neuropsychology; 2019 Nov; 33(8):1136-1150. PubMed ID: 31380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response inhibition or evaluation of danger? An event-related potential study regarding the origin of the motor interference effect from dangerous objects.
    Liu P; Cao R; Chen X; Wang Y
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():63-73. PubMed ID: 28365315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neurocognitive processes mediate the relation between children's motor skills, cardiorespiratory fitness and response inhibition: Evidence from source imaging.
    Ludyga S; Möhring W; Budde H; Hirt N; Pühse U; Gerber M
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Feb; 58(2):e13716. PubMed ID: 33128487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. N2 and P3 modulation during partial inhibition in a modified go/nogo task.
    Nguyen AT; Moyle JJ; Fox AM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Sep; 107():63-71. PubMed ID: 27394185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention-related modulation of frontal midline theta oscillations in cingulate cortex during a spatial cueing Go/NoGo task.
    Hong X; Sun J; Wang J; Li C; Tong S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Feb; 148():1-12. PubMed ID: 31857191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioral response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Kim MS; Kim YY; Yoo SY; Kwon JS
    Depress Anxiety; 2007; 24(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 16933318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrocortical measures of performance monitoring from go/no-go and flanker tasks: Differential relations with trait dimensions of the triarchic model of psychopathy.
    Ribes-Guardiola P; Poy R; Patrick CJ; Moltó J
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Jun; 57(6):e13573. PubMed ID: 32237155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanisms of deficit of visuospatial attention shift in children with developmental coordination disorder: a neurophysiological measure of the endogenous Posner paradigm.
    Tsai CL; Pan CY; Cherng RJ; Hsu YW; Chiu HH
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):246-58. PubMed ID: 19751962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binge drinking affects brain oscillations linked to motor inhibition and execution.
    López-Caneda E; Rodríguez Holguín S; Correas Á; Carbia C; González-Villar A; Maestú F; Cadaveira F
    J Psychopharmacol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):873-882. PubMed ID: 28168896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Executive function in children with and without developmental coordination disorder: A comparative study.
    Sartori RF; Valentini NC; Fonseca RP
    Child Care Health Dev; 2020 May; 46(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 31845379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conflict adaptation within but not across NoGo decision criteria: Event-related-potential evidence of specificity in the contextual modulation of cognitive control.
    Feldman JL; Clark SL; Freitas AL
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jul; 109():132-40. PubMed ID: 26003915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: children vs. adults.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Borchard JP
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 125(10):1995-2006. PubMed ID: 24661623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impaired motor inhibition in developmental coordination disorder.
    He JL; Fuelscher I; Coxon J; Barhoun P; Parmar D; Enticott PG; Hyde C
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Nov; 127():23-33. PubMed ID: 30245237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.