These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32302889)

  • 1. PyScratch: An ease of use tool for analysis of scratch assays.
    Garcia-Fossa F; Gaal V; de Jesus MB
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Sep; 193():105476. PubMed ID: 32302889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An image J plugin for the high throughput image analysis of in vitro scratch wound healing assays.
    Suarez-Arnedo A; Torres Figueroa F; Clavijo C; Arbeláez P; Cruz JC; Muñoz-Camargo C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0232565. PubMed ID: 32722676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scratch Wound Healing Assay.
    Martinotti S; Ranzato E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2109():225-229. PubMed ID: 31414347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cell Image Velocimetry (CIV): boosting the automated quantification of cell migration in wound healing assays.
    Milde F; Franco D; Ferrari A; Kurtcuoglu V; Poulikakos D; Koumoutsakos P
    Integr Biol (Camb); 2012 Nov; 4(11):1437-47. PubMed ID: 23047374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TScratch: a novel and simple software tool for automated analysis of monolayer wound healing assays.
    Gebäck T; Schulz MM; Koumoutsakos P; Detmar M
    Biotechniques; 2009 Apr; 46(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 19450233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fluorescence-based quantitative scratch wound healing assay demonstrating the role of MAPKAPK-2/3 in fibroblast migration.
    Menon MB; Ronkina N; Schwermann J; Kotlyarov A; Gaestel M
    Cell Motil Cytoskeleton; 2009 Dec; 66(12):1041-7. PubMed ID: 19743408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. KREAP: an automated Galaxy platform to quantify in vitro re-epithelialization kinetics.
    Fernandez-Gutierrez MM; van Zessen DBH; van Baarlen P; Kleerebezem M; Stubbs AP
    Gigascience; 2018 Jul; 7(7):. PubMed ID: 29961849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An effective device to enable consistent scratches for in vitro scratch assays.
    Chen S; Bin Abdul Rahim AA; Mok P; Liu D
    BMC Biotechnol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):32. PubMed ID: 37641063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extended live-tracking and quantitative characterization of wound healing and cell migration with SiR-Hoechst.
    Chung HH; Bellefeuille SD; Miller HN; Gaborski TR
    Exp Cell Res; 2018 Dec; 373(1-2):198-210. PubMed ID: 30399373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A high-throughput cell migration assay using scratch wound healing, a comparison of image-based readout methods.
    Yarrow JC; Perlman ZE; Westwood NJ; Mitchison TJ
    BMC Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 4():21. PubMed ID: 15357872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CellMissy: a tool for management, storage and analysis of cell migration data produced in wound healing-like assays.
    Masuzzo P; Hulstaert N; Huyck L; Ampe C; Van Troys M; Martens L
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Oct; 29(20):2661-3. PubMed ID: 23918247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and stem cell supernatant on equine corneal wound healing in vitro.
    Sherman AB; Gilger BC; Berglund AK; Schnabel LV
    Stem Cell Res Ther; 2017 May; 8(1):120. PubMed ID: 28545510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A cost-effective tool to standardize the scratch assay for cell migration.
    Bucchi C; Baeza J; Guarda J; Bucchi A; Martínez-Rodríguez P
    Biol Cell; 2024 Oct; 116(10):e2400061. PubMed ID: 39151164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. qCMA: a desktop application for quantitative collective cell migration analysis.
    Zeisel A; Yitzhaky A; Koerner C; Lauriola M; Cohen-Dvashi H; Köstler WJ; Yarden Y; Wiemann S; Domany E
    J Biomol Screen; 2013 Mar; 18(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 23042078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scratch Migration Assay and Dorsal Skinfold Chamber for In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis of Wound Healing.
    Belkacemi A; Laschke MW; Menger MD; Flockerzi V
    J Vis Exp; 2019 Sep; (151):. PubMed ID: 31609328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A quantitative, facile, and high-throughput image-based cell migration method is a robust alternative to the scratch assay.
    Gough W; Hulkower KI; Lynch R; McGlynn P; Uhlik M; Yan L; Lee JA
    J Biomol Screen; 2011 Feb; 16(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 21297103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A high throughput, interactive imaging, bright-field wound healing assay.
    Zordan MD; Mill CP; Riese DJ; Leary JF
    Cytometry A; 2011 Mar; 79(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 22045642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IL-6 as a corneal wound healing mediator in an in vitro scratch assay.
    Arranz-Valsero I; Soriano-Romaní L; García-Posadas L; López-García A; Diebold Y
    Exp Eye Res; 2014 Aug; 125():183-92. PubMed ID: 24971496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between fibroblast wound healing and cell random migration assays in vitro.
    Ascione F; Vasaturo A; Caserta S; D'Esposito V; Formisano P; Guido S
    Exp Cell Res; 2016 Sep; 347(1):123-132. PubMed ID: 27475838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Cell Invasion and Migration Process: A Comparison of the Video Microscope-based Scratch Wound Assay and the Boyden Chamber Assay.
    Guy JB; Espenel S; Vallard A; Battiston-Montagne P; Wozny AS; Ardail D; Alphonse G; Rancoule C; Rodriguez-Lafrasse C; Magne N
    J Vis Exp; 2017 Nov; (129):. PubMed ID: 29286429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.