128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32304314)
1. Safety of misoprostol vaginal insert for labor induction using standard vs. adjusted retrieval criteria: a comparative cohort study.
Brandstetter A; Döbert M; Schwaerzler P; Döbert TF; Hasselbeck H; Henrich W
J Perinat Med; 2020 Jun; 48(5):488-494. PubMed ID: 32304314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standard and adjusted criteria for the use of the misoprostol vaginal insert for labor induction: a comparative cohort study.
Brandstetter A; Döbert M; Schwaerzler P; Döbert TF; Hasselbeck H; Henrich W
J Perinat Med; 2019 Sep; 47(7):750-756. PubMed ID: 31373898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol for labor induction in term pregnancies: a pair-matched case-control study.
Döbert M; Brandstetter A; Henrich W; Rawnaq T; Hasselbeck H; Döbert TF; Hinkson L; Schwaerzler P
J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 28672758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol vaginal insert vs. oral misoprostol for induction of labor.
Redling K; Schaedelin S; Huhn EA; Hoesli I
J Perinat Med; 2019 Feb; 47(2):176-182. PubMed ID: 30179853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study.
Schmidt M; Neophytou M; Hars O; Freudenberg J; Kühnert M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30374645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Slow-release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.
Wallström T; Strandberg M; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Pilo C; Jarnbert-Pettersson H; Friman-Mathiasson M; Wiberg-Itzel E
BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 30989788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of labour with retrievable prostaglandin vaginal inserts: outcomes following retrieval due to an intrapartum adverse event.
Rugarn O; Tipping D; Powers B; Wing DA
BJOG; 2017 Apr; 124(5):796-803. PubMed ID: 27307397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tachysystole and risk of cesarean section after labor induction using misoprostol: A cohort study.
Sichitiu J; Vial Y; Panchaud A; Baud D; Desseauve D
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():54-58. PubMed ID: 32361173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes.
Rankin K; Chodankar R; Raymond K; Bhaskar S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Apr; 235():93-96. PubMed ID: 30122321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misoprostol vaginal insert for successful labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Wing DA; Miller H; Parker L; Powers BL; Rayburn WF;
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):533-541. PubMed ID: 21343755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do we need a 200 μg misoprostol vaginal insert? A retrospective cohort study comparing the misoprostol vaginal insert to oral misoprostol.
Wegener S; Koenigbauer JT; Laesser C; Metz M; Pech L; Kummer J; Daut J; Jarchau U; Wegener V; Hellmeyer L
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jun; 46(6):851-857. PubMed ID: 32363787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal heart rate and cardiotocographic abnormalities with varying dose misoprostol vaginal inserts.
Stephenson ML; Powers BL; Wing DA
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jan; 26(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 22712609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of dinoprostone gel, misoprostol vaginal insert and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labour in twin pregnancies.
Gent J; Oliver E; Quigley H; Sharp A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jul; 286():23-27. PubMed ID: 37167810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Excessive uterine activity accompanying induced labor.
Crane JM; Young DC; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 97(6):926-31. PubMed ID: 11384698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Misoprostol vaginal insert and Foley catheter in labour induction - single center retrospective observational study of obstetrical outcome.
Mlodawski J; Mlodawska M; Plusajska J; Galuszewska J; Glijer K; Gluszek S
Ginekol Pol; 2020; 91(11):700-703. PubMed ID: 33301165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
