These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32304314)

  • 21. A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study.
    Marsdal KE; Sørbye IK; Gaudernack LC; Lukasse M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29304769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu A; Lv J; Hu Y; Lang J; Ma L; Chen W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 24698022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets.
    Eriksson A; Jeppesen S; Krebs L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Feb; 20(1):79. PubMed ID: 32033600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gattás DSMB; de Amorim MMR; Feitosa FEL; da Silva-Junior JR; Ribeiro LCG; Souza GFA; Souza ASR
    Reprod Health; 2020 Apr; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 32272959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
    Mbaluka CM; Kamau K; Karanja JG; Mugo N
    East Afr Med J; 2014 Sep; 91(9):303-10. PubMed ID: 26866082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maternal and neonatal outcome of labour induction at term comparing two regimens of misoprostol.
    Kreft M; Krähenmann F; Roos M; Kurmanavicius J; Zimmermann R; Ochsenbein-Kölble N
    J Perinat Med; 2014 Sep; 42(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 24633747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.
    Zeteroglu S; Sahin GH; Sahin HA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Dec; 129(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 16406221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of vaginal pH on labor induction with vaginal misoprostol.
    Chandra S; Allen V; Lee W; Fanning C; Young D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jun; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 16009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial.
    De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Envid Lázaro BM; Franco Royo MJ; Roca Arquillué M; Campillos Maza JM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):913-919. PubMed ID: 30723912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
    McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative study of the outcome of induction of labor using 25 µg and 50 µg of vaginal misoprostol.
    Loto OM; Ikuomola AA; Ayuba II; Onwudiegwu U
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Nov; 25(11):2359-62. PubMed ID: 22640229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Misoprostol vaginal insert and time to vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wing DA; Brown R; Plante LA; Miller H; Rugarn O; Powers BL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 122(2 Pt 1):201-209. PubMed ID: 23857539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
    Lanka S; Surapaneni T; Nirmalan PK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 24888911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Labor induction with 25-microg misoprostol vaginal capsules.
    Santo S; Lourenço R; Centeno M; Pargana L; Clode N; Ferreira H; da Graça LM
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 68(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 19797903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial.
    Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.