120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32304453)
1. Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test in Nursing Practice: A Cross-sectional Survey.
Nie W; Tang J; Zulkowski K; Wang L; Zan T
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2020 May; 33(5):1-7. PubMed ID: 32304453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cultural adaptation of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test for use in Brazil.
Rabeh SAN; Palfreyman S; Souza CBL; Bernardes RM; Caliri MHL
Rev Bras Enferm; 2018; 71(4):1977-1984. PubMed ID: 30156686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Australian Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Injury Prevention and Management: A Cross-sectional Survey.
Fulbrook P; Lawrence P; Miles S
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2019; 46(2):106-112. PubMed ID: 30801563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Pieper-Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge test.
Pieper B; Zulkowski K
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Sep; 27(9):413-9. PubMed ID: 25133343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating the Psychometric Properties of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test among Nurses in Iran.
Moharramzadeh H; Heidarzadeh M; Aghamohammadi-Kalkhoran M
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2021 Mar; 34(3):1-6. PubMed ID: 33587479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Descriptive, Cross-sectional Survey of Turkish Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Ulcer Risk, Prevention, and Staging.
Gul A; Andsoy II; Ozkaya B; Zeydan A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Jun; 63(6):40-46. PubMed ID: 28657899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and Reliability of the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test for Use in Turkey.
Yeşil M; Toygar İ; Aslan FE
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2024 Mar; 37(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 38393708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: A cross-sectional survey.
Huang X; Zan T; Tang J; Zhang D; Zu W; Wang T; Wang L; Nie W
Int Wound J; 2022 Dec; 19(8):2019-2030. PubMed ID: 35307948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing Pressure Injury Knowledge Using the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test.
Delmore B; Ayello EA; Smart H; Sibbald RG
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 31(9):406-412. PubMed ID: 30134276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the Impact of an Innovative Educational Program for Skin Care Champions Using the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test.
Delmore B; Smith DJ; Savage E; Ayello EA
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2020 May; 33(5):252-259. PubMed ID: 32304448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Content Validity and Reliability of the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test and the Knowledge Level of Portuguese Nurses at Long-Term Care Units: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Furtado K; Lopes T; Afonso A; Infante P; Voorham J; Lopes M
J Clin Med; 2022 Jan; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 35160035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pressure Injury Knowledge in Critical Care Nurses.
Miller DM; Neelon L; Kish-Smith K; Whitney L; Burant CJ
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2017; 44(5):455-457. PubMed ID: 28650412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical device-related pressure injury knowledge assessment for nurses: development and psychometric validation of a multiple choice test.
Dalli ÖE; Girgin NK
J Wound Care; 2023 Jun; 32(Sup6a):lxxv-lxxxvi. PubMed ID: 37306382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - Staff version (PCQ-S).
Cai L; Ahlström G; Tang P; Ma K; Edvardsson D; Behm L; Fu H; Zhang J; Yang J
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017250. PubMed ID: 28851797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of pressure injury knowledge using PZ-PUKT questionnaire among Indian nurses and the evaluation of impact of an educational intervention on the knowledge scores: A quasi-experimental study.
John AM; Nayak U KR; Lobo G; Thaleppaddy M
J Tissue Viability; 2024 May; 33(2):215-219. PubMed ID: 38360495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of nursing practice environment scale.
Chiang HY; Lin SY
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Mar; 18(6):919-29. PubMed ID: 19017371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool-updated version (PUKAT 2.0).
Dalli ÖE; Yildirim Y; Çalişkan G; Girgin NK
J Tissue Viability; 2022 Feb; 31(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 34429220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and reliability of Japanese version of the pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool.
Yamamoto-Kon A; Fukahori H; Ogata Y; Nagano M
J Tissue Viability; 2021 Nov; 30(4):566-570. PubMed ID: 34407913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of the Current Status of Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Injuries and Factors Influencing It in Shaanxi Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Luo L; Wen X; Wang J; Xiao Q; Su L; Zhou M
Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2024; 17():1451-1462. PubMed ID: 38841316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining the pressure injury and staging knowledge of nurses at a hospital in Turkey.
Sayar S; Aşkın Ceran M; Demir A
J Tissue Viability; 2022 Nov; 31(4):735-740. PubMed ID: 36041891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
