BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32304533)

  • 1. The Effects of Age, Distraction, and Simulated Central Vision Impairment on Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
    Zhang CT; Bowers AR; Savage SW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Apr; 97(4):239-248. PubMed ID: 32304533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driving with central field loss I: effect of central scotomas on responses to hazards.
    Bronstad PM; Bowers AR; Albu A; Goldstein R; Peli E
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 23329309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a Paradigm to Investigate Detection of Road Hazards when Using a Bioptic Telescope.
    Bowers AR; Bronstad PM; Spano LP; Huq B; Tang X; Doherty A; Peli E; Luo G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Sep; 95(9):785-794. PubMed ID: 29863502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual attention measures predict pedestrian detection in central field loss: a pilot study.
    Alberti CF; Horowitz T; Bronstad PM; Bowers AR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89381. PubMed ID: 24558495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of simulated mild vision loss on gaze, driving and interaction behaviors in pedestrian crossing situations.
    Lehsing C; Ruch F; Kölsch FM; Dyszak GN; Haag C; Feldstein IT; Savage SW; Bowers AR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():138-151. PubMed ID: 30754016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driving with Central Visual Field Loss II: How Scotomas above or below the Preferred Retinal Locus (PRL) Affect Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.
    Bronstad PM; Albu A; Bowers AR; Goldstein R; Peli E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136517. PubMed ID: 26332315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Good distractions: Testing the effects of listening to an audiobook on driving performance in simple and complex road environments.
    Nowosielski RJ; Trick LM; Toxopeus R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():202-209. PubMed ID: 29223795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driving with hemianopia: III. Detection of stationary and approaching pedestrians in a simulator.
    Alberti CF; Peli E; Bowers AR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jan; 55(1):368-74. PubMed ID: 24346175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
    Haque MM; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual motion perception predicts driving hazard perception ability.
    Lacherez P; Au S; Wood JM
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 92(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 23025481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hazard Perception in Visually Impaired Drivers Who Use Bioptic Telescopes.
    Deffler RA; Cooley SL; Kohl HA; Raasch TW; Dougherty BE
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 Jun; 13(6):5. PubMed ID: 38869357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeing pedestrians at night: effect of driver age and visual abilities.
    Wood JM; Lacherez P; Tyrrell RA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Jul; 34(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 24888897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of simulated acuity and contrast sensitivity impairments on detection of pedestrian hazards in a driving simulator.
    Swan G; Shahin M; Albert J; Herrmann J; Bowers AR
    Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav; 2019 Jul; 64():213-226. PubMed ID: 31983886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual attention outperforms visual-perceptual parameters required by law as an indicator of on-road driving performance.
    Grundler W; Strasburger H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236147. PubMed ID: 32797082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driving with pets and motor vehicle collision involvement among older drivers: A prospective population-based study.
    Huisingh C; Levitan EB; Irvin MR; Owsley C; McGwin G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Mar; 88():169-74. PubMed ID: 26774042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of distracted driving on safety and traffic flow.
    Stavrinos D; Jones JL; Garner AA; Griffin R; Franklin CA; Ball D; Welburn SC; Ball KK; Sisiopiku VP; Fine PR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Dec; 61():63-70. PubMed ID: 23465745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.
    Chaparro A; Wood JM; Carberry T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):747-54. PubMed ID: 16127341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Driving with hemianopia, I: Detection performance in a driving simulator.
    Bowers AR; Mandel AJ; Goldstein RB; Peli E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 50(11):5137-47. PubMed ID: 19608541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impacts of visual and cognitive distractions and time pressure on pedestrian crossing behaviour: A simulator study.
    Tian K; Markkula G; Wei C; Sadraei E; Hirose T; Merat N; Romano R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106770. PubMed ID: 35853148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driver distraction and in-vehicle interventions: A driving simulator study on visual attention and driving performance.
    Ezzati Amini R; Al Haddad C; Batabyal D; Gkena I; De Vos B; Cuenen A; Brijs T; Antoniou C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107195. PubMed ID: 37441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.