These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32305764)

  • 41. Digestate management for high-solid anaerobic digestion of organic wastes: A review.
    Peng W; Lü F; Hao L; Zhang H; Shao L; He P
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Feb; 297():122485. PubMed ID: 31810738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Anaerobic digestate management, environmental impacts, and techno-economic challenges.
    Lamolinara B; Pérez-Martínez A; Guardado-Yordi E; Guillén Fiallos C; Diéguez-Santana K; Ruiz-Mercado GJ
    Waste Manag; 2022 Mar; 140():14-30. PubMed ID: 35032793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Environmental assessment of digestate treatment technologies using LCA methodology.
    Vázquez-Rowe I; Golkowska K; Lebuf V; Vaneeckhaute C; Michels E; Meers E; Benetto E; Koster D
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():442-59. PubMed ID: 26092475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The economic and environmental benefits analysis for food waste anaerobic treatment: a case study in Beijing.
    Guo X; Yang X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(10):10374-10386. PubMed ID: 30761499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Food-waste anaerobic digestate as a fertilizer: The agronomic properties of untreated digestate and biochar-filtered digestate residue.
    Song S; Lim JW; Lee JTE; Cheong JC; Hoy SH; Hu Q; Tan JKN; Chiam Z; Arora S; Lum TQH; Lim EY; Wang CH; Tan HTW; Tong YW
    Waste Manag; 2021 Dec; 136():143-152. PubMed ID: 34666296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Hybrid solid anaerobic digestion batch: biomethane production and mass recovery from the organic fraction of solid waste.
    Di Maria F; Gigliotti G; Sordi A; Micale C; Zadra C; Massaccesi L
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Aug; 31(8):869-73. PubMed ID: 23444150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management options for India.
    Khandelwal H; Thalla AK; Kumar S; Kumar R
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Sep; 288():121515. PubMed ID: 31125936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessment and mitigation of the environmental burdens to air from land applied food-based digestate.
    Tiwary A; Williams ID; Pant DC; Kishore VVN
    Environ Pollut; 2015 Aug; 203():262-270. PubMed ID: 25690986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Alternative seagrass wrack management practices in the circular bioeconomy framework: A life cycle assessment approach.
    Mainardis M; Magnolo F; Ferrara C; Vance C; Misson G; De Feo G; Speelman S; Murphy F; Goi D
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 798():149283. PubMed ID: 34375248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Solid anaerobic digestion batch of bio-waste as pre-treatment for improving amendment quality: The effect of inoculum recirculation.
    Di Maria F; Segoloni E; Pezzolla D
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():106-12. PubMed ID: 27262178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Novel trends in anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste.
    De Baere L
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2003; 68(2 Pt A):117-24. PubMed ID: 15296145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Life cycle assessment of bagasse waste management options.
    Kiatkittipong W; Wongsuchoto P; Pavasant P
    Waste Manag; 2009 May; 29(5):1628-33. PubMed ID: 19136243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Three different methods for turning olive pomace in resource: Benefits of the end products for agricultural purpose.
    Muscolo A; Papalia T; Settineri G; Romeo F; Mallamaci C
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 662():1-7. PubMed ID: 30682711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Food waste conversion options in Singapore: environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective.
    Khoo HH; Lim TZ; Tan RB
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Feb; 408(6):1367-73. PubMed ID: 19926117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Fertilizer potential of liquid and solid effluent from thermophilic anaerobic digestion of poultry waste.
    Liedl BE; Bombardiere J; Chaffield JM
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 53(8):69-79. PubMed ID: 16784191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of paper and cardboard suppression on OFMSW anaerobic digestion.
    Fonoll X; Astals S; Dosta J; Mata-Alvarez J
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():100-5. PubMed ID: 27290631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).
    Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R;
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Optimization of solid state anaerobic digestion of the OFMSW by digestate recirculation: A new approach.
    Michele P; Giuliana D; Carlo M; Sergio S; Fabrizio A
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():111-8. PubMed ID: 25305682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Environmental performance evolution of municipal solid waste management by life cycle assessment in Hangzhou, China.
    Zhou Z; Tang Y; Dong J; Chi Y; Ni M; Li N; Zhang Y
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Dec; 227():23-33. PubMed ID: 30172156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Anaerobic digestion of food waste - Challenges and opportunities.
    Xu F; Li Y; Ge X; Yang L; Li Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Jan; 247():1047-1058. PubMed ID: 28965912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.