These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32305847)

  • 1. Granular sludge is a preferable inoculum for the biochemical methane potential assay for two complex substrates.
    Posmanik R; Kim AH; Labatut RA; Usack JG; Angenent LT
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Aug; 309():123359. PubMed ID: 32305847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inoculum selection influences the biochemical methane potential of agro-industrial substrates.
    De Vrieze J; Raport L; Willems B; Verbrugge S; Volcke E; Meers E; Angenent LT; Boon N
    Microb Biotechnol; 2015 Sep; 8(5):776-86. PubMed ID: 25756301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anaerobic co-digestion of the aqueous phase from hydrothermally treated waste activated sludge with primary sewage sludge. A kinetic study.
    Villamil JA; Mohedano AF; Rodriguez JJ; De la Rubia MA
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 231():726-733. PubMed ID: 30399549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of inoculum's origin on the methane yield of different substrates in biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests.
    Koch K; Lippert T; Drewes JE
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Nov; 243():457-463. PubMed ID: 28688329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of liquid and dewatered digestate as inoculum for anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes.
    Hosseini Koupaie E; Azizi A; Bazyar Lakeh AA; Hafez H; Elbeshbishy E
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():228-236. PubMed ID: 31109522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of food waste and primary sludge: influence of inoculum pre-incubation and inoculum source.
    Elbeshbishy E; Nakhla G; Hafez H
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Apr; 110():18-25. PubMed ID: 22342042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of inoculum source and co-digestion strategies on anaerobic digestion of residues generated in the treatment of waste vegetable oils.
    Hidalgo D; Martín-Marroquín JM
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Sep; 142():17-22. PubMed ID: 24794521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of methanogenic biomass acclimation in mesophilic anaerobic digestion of ultrasound pretreated sludge.
    Gagliano MC; Gallipoli A; Rossetti S; Braguglia CM
    Environ Technol; 2018 May; 39(10):1250-1259. PubMed ID: 28475436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhanced biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion from a trinary mix substrate over a binary mix substrate.
    Ara E; Sartaj M; Kennedy K
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Jun; 33(6):578-87. PubMed ID: 25964293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early assessment of a rapid alternative method for the estimation of the biomethane potential of sewage sludge.
    Bellaton S; Guérin S; Pautremat N; Bernier J; Muller M; Motellet S; Azimi S; Pauss A; Rocher V
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Apr; 206():279-284. PubMed ID: 26869069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anaerobic treatment of deinking sludge: Methane production and organic matter degradation.
    Amare DE; Ogun MK; Körner I
    Waste Manag; 2019 Feb; 85():417-424. PubMed ID: 30803596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inactivation of enteric indicator bacteria and system stability during dry co-digestion of food waste and pig manure.
    Jiang Y; Dennehy C; Lawlor PG; Hu Z; Zhan X; Gardiner GE
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 612():293-302. PubMed ID: 28850849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fat, oil, and grease (FOG) deposits yield higher methane than FOG in anaerobic co-digestion with waste activated sludge.
    Hao J; de Los Reyes Iii FL; He X
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Aug; 268():110708. PubMed ID: 32510442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of different types of anaerobic seed sludge for the high rate anaerobic digestion of pig slurry in UASB reactors.
    Rico C; Montes JA; Rico JL
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Aug; 238():147-156. PubMed ID: 28433902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ADM1 calibration using BMP tests for modeling the effect of autohydrolysis pretreatment on the performance of continuous sludge digesters.
    Souza TS; Carvajal A; Donoso-Bravo A; Peña M; Fdz-Polanco F
    Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(9):3244-54. PubMed ID: 23582667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Co-digestion of molasses or kitchen waste with high-rate activated sludge results in a diverse microbial community with stable methane production.
    De Vrieze J; Plovie K; Verstraete W; Boon N
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Apr; 152():75-82. PubMed ID: 25617871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of inocula carryover and inoculum dilution on the methane yields in batch methane potential tests.
    Reilly M; Dinsdale R; Guwy A
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 May; 208():134-139. PubMed ID: 26938808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An assessment of the feasibility of employing biochemical acidogenic potential tests for characterizing anaerobic biodegradability of raw and pretreated waste activated sludge.
    Kianmehr P; Parker W; Seto P
    Water Environ Res; 2012 Apr; 84(4):362-9. PubMed ID: 22834225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge with grease trap sludge and municipal solid waste as co-substrates.
    Grosser A; Neczaj E; Singh BR; Almås ÅR; Brattebø H; Kacprzak M
    Environ Res; 2017 May; 155():249-260. PubMed ID: 28237904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.