BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32306157)

  • 1. Grading of aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and pulsed Doppler of the left subclavian artery: harmonizing grading scales between imaging modalities.
    Spampinato RA; Jahnke C; Paetsch I; Hilbert S; Löbe S; Lindemann F; Strotdrees E; Hindricks G; Borger MA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1517-1526. PubMed ID: 32306157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of Aortic Valve Regurgitation by Pulsed Doppler Examination of the Left Subclavian Artery Velocity Contour: A Validation Study with Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Spampinato RA; Jahnke C; Paetsch I; Hilbert S; Busch F; Schloma V; Dmitrieva Y; Bonamigo Thome F; Löbe S; Strotdrees E; Hindricks G; Mohr FW; Borger MA
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2018 Jan; 31(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 29191732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aortic regurgitation assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography: intermodality disagreement impacting on prediction of post-surgical left ventricular remodeling.
    Neisius U; Tsao CW; Hauser TH; Patel AD; Pierce P; Ben-Assa E; Nezafat R; Manning WJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jan; 36(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 31414256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Altiok E; Frick M; Meyer CG; Al Ateah G; Napp A; Kirschfink A; Almalla M; Lotfi S; Becker M; Herich L; Lehmacher W; Hoffmann R
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(11):1859-66. PubMed ID: 24837265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of severity of aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography.
    Gabriel RS; Renapurkar R; Bolen MA; Verhaert D; Leiber M; Flamm SD; Griffin BP; Desai MY
    Am J Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 108(7):1014-20. PubMed ID: 21784393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value of CMR in quantification of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after TAVI.
    Salaun E; Jacquier A; Theron A; Giorgi R; Lambert M; Jaussaud N; Hubert S; Collart F; Bonnet JL; Habib G; Cuisset T; Grisoli D
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 26188194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative assessment of paravalvular regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Crouch G; Tully PJ; Bennetts J; Sinhal A; Bradbrook C; Penhall AL; De Pasquale CG; Baker RA; Selvanayagam JB
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 May; 17(1):32. PubMed ID: 25953135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment and quantification of aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Ribeiro HB; Le Ven F; Larose E; Dahou A; Nombela-Franco L; Urena M; Allende R; Amat-Santos I; Ricapito Mde L; Thébault C; Clavel MA; Delarochelliére R; Doyle D; Dumont E; Dumesnil JG; Pibarot P; Rodés-Cabau J
    Heart; 2014 Dec; 100(24):1924-32. PubMed ID: 25124218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aortic regurgitation and left ventricle remodeling on cardiac magnetic resonance and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Haberka M; Bałys M; Gąsior Z; Stasiów B
    Kardiol Pol; 2021; 79(9):965-971. PubMed ID: 34176113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic and Prognostic Utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Aortic Regurgitation.
    Kammerlander AA; Wiesinger M; Duca F; Aschauer S; Binder C; Zotter Tufaro C; Nitsche C; Badre-Eslam R; Schönbauer R; Bartko P; Beitzke D; Loewe C; Hengstenberg C; Bonderman D; Mascherbauer J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 1):1474-1483. PubMed ID: 30448117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinct pressure half-time values by transthoracic echocardiography for grading of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Schröder J; Almalla M; Saad M; Mezger M; Keszei A; Frick M; Lotfi S; Hoffmann R; Becker M; Altiok E
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2549. PubMed ID: 32054935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accurate Quantification Methods for Aortic Insufficiency Severity in Patients With LVAD: Role of Diastolic Flow Acceleration and Systolic-to-Diastolic Peak Velocity Ratio of Outflow Cannula.
    Grinstein J; Kruse E; Sayer G; Fedson S; Kim GH; Jorde UP; Juricek C; Ota T; Jeevanandam V; Lang RM; Uriel N
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 9(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 26684975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: aortic root angiography in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Frick M; Meyer CG; Kirschfink A; Altiok E; Lehrke M; Brehmer K; Lotfi S; Hoffmann R
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Mar; 11(12):1419-27. PubMed ID: 25772902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aortic regurgitation: multimodal assessment of quantification and impact.
    N'Cho-Mottoh MB; Huttin O; Selton-Suty C; Scadi S; Filippetti L; Marie PY
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2023 Jan-Apr 23; 34(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 35265958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic regurgitation severity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation is underestimated by echocardiography compared with MRI.
    Orwat S; Diller GP; Kaleschke G; Kerckhoff G; Kempny A; Radke RM; Buerke B; Burg M; Schülke C; Baumgartner H
    Heart; 2014 Dec; 100(24):1933-8. PubMed ID: 25060755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Cawley PJ; Hamilton-Craig C; Owens DS; Krieger EV; Strugnell WE; Mitsumori L; D'Jang CL; Schwaegler RG; Nguyen KQ; Nguyen B; Maki JH; Otto CM
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 6(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23212272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-Analysis of Transthoracic Echocardiography Versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
    Papanastasiou CA; Kokkinidis DG; Jonnalagadda AK; Oikonomou EK; Kampaktsis PN; Garcia MJ; Myerson SG; Karamitsos TD
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 124(8):1246-1251. PubMed ID: 31466694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance to Evaluate Aortic Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Ribeiro HB; Orwat S; Hayek SS; Larose É; Babaliaros V; Dahou A; Le Ven F; Pasian S; Puri R; Abdul-Jawad Altisent O; Campelo-Parada F; Clavel MA; Pibarot P; Lerakis S; Baumgartner H; Rodés-Cabau J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 68(6):577-585. PubMed ID: 27491900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the regurgitant orifice area in aortic regurgitation with dual-source CT: Comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Ko SM; Park JH; Shin JK; Kim JS
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 26088382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.